首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare >Attributes of innovations and approaches to scalability – lessons from a national program to extend the scope of practice of health professionals
【2h】

Attributes of innovations and approaches to scalability – lessons from a national program to extend the scope of practice of health professionals

机译:创新和可扩展性方法的属性-国家计划的经验教训以扩大卫生专业人员的执业范围

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The context for the paper was the evaluation of a national program in Australia to investigate extended scopes of practice for health professionals (paramedics, physiotherapists, and nurses). The design of the evaluation involved a mixed-methods approach with multiple data sources. Four multidisciplinary models of extended scope of practice were tested over an 18-month period, involving 26 organizations, 224 health professionals, and 36 implementation sites. The evaluation focused on what could be learned to inform scaling up the extended scopes of practice on a national scale. The evaluation findings were used to develop a conceptual framework for use by clinicians, managers, and policy makers to determine appropriate strategies for scaling up effective innovations. Development of the framework was informed by the literature on the diffusion of innovations, particularly an understanding that certain attributes of innovations influence adoption. The framework recognizes the role played by three groups of stakeholders: evidence producers, evidence influencers, and evidence adopters. The use of the framework is illustrated with four case studies from the evaluation. The findings demonstrate how the scaling up of innovations can be influenced by three quite distinct approaches – letting adoption take place in an uncontrolled, unplanned, way; actively helping the process of adoption; or taking deliberate steps to ensure that adoption takes place. Development of the conceptual framework resulted in two sets of questions to guide decisions about scalability, one for those considering whether to adopt the innovation (evidence adopters), and the other for those trying to decide on the optimal strategy for dissemination (evidence influencers).
机译:本文的背景是对澳大利亚一项国家计划的评估,该计划旨在调查卫生专业人员(护理人员,物理治疗师和护士)的广泛执业范围。评估的设计涉及具有多种数据源的混合方法。在18个月的时间里测试了四个扩展实践范围的多学科模型,涉及26个组织,224位卫生专业人员和36个实施站点。评估侧重于可学到的知识,以在全国范围内扩大实践范围。评估结果被用于建立一个概念框架,供临床医生,管理人员和政策制定者使用,以确定扩大有效创新规模的适当策略。有关创新传播的文献为该框架的发展提供了信息,尤其是了解创新的某些属性会影响采用。该框架承认三类利益相关者所扮演的角色:证据产生者,证据影响者和证据采用者。评估中的四个案例研究说明了该框架的使用。研究结果表明,如何通过三种截然不同的方法来影响创新的规模化:让采用不受控制,无计划的方式进行;积极帮助收养过程;或采取有步骤的措施来确保采用。概念框架的发展产生了两套问题,以指导有关可伸缩性的决策,一套用于考虑是否采用创新的人(证据采用者),另一套用于试图确定最佳传播策略的人(证据影响者)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号