首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SpringerPlus >The effect of discrepancy between radiologic size and pathologic tumor size in renal cell cancer
【2h】

The effect of discrepancy between radiologic size and pathologic tumor size in renal cell cancer

机译:肾细胞癌的放射学大小与病理性肿瘤大小差异的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To investigate the difference between preoperative radiologic tumor size (RTS) and postoperative pathologic tumor size (PTS) in patients who underwent nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. We retrospectively reviewed 257 patients who received preoperative computed tomography (CT) before radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma from January 2010 to May 2015 in Huashan Hospital, Shanghai. RTS was defined as the largest diameter of tumor measured by CT and PTS as the largest diameter of tumor measured in the surgical specimens. Among all subjects, mean RTS was larger than PTS (4.57 ± 2.15 vs. 4.02 ± 2.15 cm, P = 0.004) with a discrepancy of 0.55 cm. When the patients were categorized according to T stage, the mean RTS was greater than PTS in the following groups: ≤4 cm group (2.90 vs. 2.59 cm, P = 0.02), >4 and ≤7 cm group (5.08 vs. 4.38 cm, P < 0.0001), except for >7 cm (8.9 vs. 8.0 cm, P = 0.142). Among patients with clear cell RCC, the mean RTS was larger than the mean PTS (4.57 vs. 3.98 cm, P = 0.004), similar result was also seen in non-clear cell group (4.54 vs. 4.16 cm, P = 0.045). The mean RTS was larger than PTS for the approach of radical nephrectomy (RN) (5.26 vs. 4.64 cm, P = 0.01), but not for the partial nephrectomy (PN) (3.34 vs. 2.92 cm, P = 0.067). Of the 257 renal cancers, 76 tumors were down-staged when comparing radiographic and pathologic tumor maximal diameter. The proportion of down-staged tumors had no difference between different genders (P = 0.283), different surgery approaches (P = 0.102), and different pathology types (P = 0.209). In this study, we found that renal tumor size was overestimated by radiography compared with pathologic results, and the T staging of some tumors was down-staged. But for patients who underwent PN, there was no difference between RTS and PTS. These results suggested that the PN should be considered first for the T1b renal tumor when tumor size was close to 4 cm, while the recommendation level of PN for T1b tumor was grade B according to EAU guidelines.
机译:目的探讨肾细胞癌肾切除术患者的术前放射肿瘤大小(RTS)和术后病理肿瘤大小(PTS)之间的差异。我们回顾性分析了2010年1月至2015年5月在上海华山医院接受根治性或部分性肾切除术的257例接受术前计算机断层扫描(CT)的肾细胞癌患者。 RTS被定义为通过CT和PTS测量的最大肿瘤直径,为在手术标本中测量的最大肿瘤直径。在所有受试者中,平均RTS大于PTS(4.57±2.15 vs.4.02±2.15 cm,P = 0.004),差异为0.55 cm。当按T期对患者进行分类时,以下组的平均RTS大于PTS:≤4cm组(2.90对2.59 cm,P = 0.02),> 4和≤7cm组(5.08对4.38)厘米,P <0.0001),但> 7厘米(8.9对8.0厘米,P = 0.142)除外。在具有透明细胞RCC的患者中,平均RTS大于平均PTS(4.57 vs.3.98 cm,P = 0.004),在非透明细胞组中也观察到相似的结果(4.54 vs.4.16 cm,P = 0.045) 。根治性肾切除术(RN)的平均RTS大于PTS(5.26 vs.4.64 cm,P = 0.01),而不是部分肾切除术(PN)(3.34 vs.2.92 cm,P = 0.067)。比较放射影像学和病理性肿瘤最大直径时,在257例肾癌中,有76例肿瘤被下调。在不同性别(P = 0.283),不同手术方法(P = 0.102)和不同病理类型(P = 0.209)之间,晚期肿瘤的比例没有差异。在这项研究中,我们发现,与病理结果相比,放射线照相术高估了肾脏肿瘤的大小,并且某些肿瘤的T分期被降低了。但是对于接受PN的患者,RTS和PTS之间没有差异。这些结果表明,当肿瘤大小接近4 cm时,对于T1b肾肿瘤应首先考虑PN,而根据EAU指南,对T1b肿瘤的PN推荐水平为B级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号