首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical Physics >Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis
【2h】

Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis

机译:用于乳腺癌诊断的异构数据决策融合的优化方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As more diagnostic testing options become available to physicians, it becomes more difficult to combine various types of medical information together in order to optimize the overall diagnosis. To improve diagnostic performance, here we introduce an approach to optimize a decision-fusion technique to combine heterogeneous information, such as from different modalities, feature categories, or institutions. For classifier comparison we used two performance metrics: The receiving operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve [area under the ROC curve (AUC)] and the normalized partial area under the curve (pAUC). This study used four classifiers: Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), artificial neural network (ANN), and two variants of our decision-fusion technique, AUC-optimized (DF-A) and pAUC-optimized (DF-P) decision fusion. We applied each of these classifiers with 100-fold cross-validation to two heterogeneous breast cancer data sets: One of mass lesion features and a much more challenging one of microcalcification lesion features. For the calcification data set, DF-A outperformed the other classifiers in terms of AUC (p<0.02) and achieved AUC=0.85±0.01. The DF-P surpassed the other classifiers in terms of pAUC (p<0.01) and reached pAUC=0.38±0.02. For the mass data set, DF-A outperformed both the ANN and the LDA (p<0.04) and achieved AUC=0.94±0.01. Although for this data set there were no statistically significant differences among the classifiers' pAUC values (pAUC=0.57±0.07 to 0.67±0.05, p>0.10), the DF-P did significantly improve specificity versus the LDA at both 98% and 100% sensitivity (p<0.04). In conclusion, decision fusion directly optimized clinically significant performance measures, such as AUC and pAUC, and sometimes outperformed two wellknown machine-learning techniques when applied to two different breast cancer data sets.
机译:随着更多的诊断测试选项可供医生使用,将各种类型的医学信息组合在一起以优化整体诊断变得更加困难。为了提高诊断性能,在这里我们介绍一种优化决策融合技术的方法,以结合异类信息,例如来自不同模式,特征类别或机构的信息。为了进行分类器比较,我们使用了两个性能指标:曲线下的接收算子特征(ROC)区域[ROC曲线下的面积(AUC)]和曲线下的归一化局部面积(pAUC)。这项研究使用了四个分类器:线性判别分析(LDA),人工神经网络(ANN)和我们的决策融合技术的两个变体,AUC优化(DF-A)和pAUC优化(DF-P)决策融合。我们将这些分类器中具有100倍交叉验证的每个分类器应用于两个异类乳腺癌数据集:一种是整体病变特征,另一种是更具挑战性的微钙化病变特征。对于钙化数据集,就AUC而言,DF-A优于其他分类器(p <0.02),并且达到AUC = 0.85±0.01。 DF-P在pAUC方面优于其他分类器(p <0.01),并达到pAUC = 0.38±0.02。对于大量数据集,DF-A优于ANN和LDA(p <0.04),达到AUC = 0.94±0.01。尽管对于该数据集,分类器的pAUC值之间没有统计学上的显着差异(pAUC = 0.57±0.07至0.67±0.05,p> 0.10),但DF-P与LDA相比在98%和100时均显着提高了特异性灵敏度百分比(p <0.04)。总之,决策融合直接优化了临床上重要的性能指标,例如AUC和pAUC,并且在应用于两个不同的乳腺癌数据集时,有时表现优于两种众所周知的机器学习技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号