【2h】

Measuring Generalized Trust

机译:衡量广义信任

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Survey institutes recently have changed their measurement of generalized trust from the standard dichotomous scale to an 11-point scale. Additionally, numerous survey institutes use different question wordings: where most rely on the standard, fully balanced question (asking if “most people can be trusted or that you need to be very careful in dealing with people”), some use minimally balanced questions, asking only if it is “possible to trust people.” By using two survey-embedded experiments, one with 12,009 self-selected respondents and the other with a probability sample of 2,947 respondents, this study evaluates the generalized trust question in terms of question wording and number of scale points used. Results show that, contrary to the more commonly used standard question format (used, for example, by the American National Election Studies and the General Social Survey), generalized trust is best measured with a minimally balanced question wording accompanied with either a seven- or an 11-point scale.
机译:调查机构最近已将其对广义信任的衡量标准从标准的二分制改为11分制。此外,许多调查机构使用不同的问题措词:大多数依赖标准的,完全平衡的问题(例如,“大多数人是否可以信任,或者在与人打交道时要非常小心”),有些则使用最低限度的问题,仅询问“是否可以信任人”。通过使用两个嵌入调查的实验,一个实验有12,009名自我选择的受访者,另一项则有2,947名受访者的概率样本,该研究根据问题的措辞和使用的磅数来评估广义信任问题。结果表明,与更常用的标准问题格式(例如,美国国家选举研究和美国一般社会调查所使用的格式)相反,广义信任最好用最小平衡的问题措辞以及七个或七个来衡量。 11分制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号