首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Psychological Science >The Color of SinWhite and Black Are Perceptual Symbols of Moral Purity and Pollution
【2h】

The Color of SinWhite and Black Are Perceptual Symbols of Moral Purity and Pollution

机译:SinWhite和Black的颜色是道德纯度和污染的感性象征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Three studies examined automatic associations between words with moral and immoral meanings and the colors black and white. The speed of color naming in a Stroop task was faster when words in black concerned immorality (e.g., greed), rather than morality, and when words in white concerned morality (e.g., honesty), rather than immorality. In addition, priming immorality by having participants hand-copy an unethical statement speeded identification of words in the black font. Making immorality salient in this way also increased the moral Stroop effect among participants who had not previously shown it. In the final study, participants also rated consumer products. Moral meanings interfered with color naming most strongly among those participants who rated personal cleaning products as especially desirable. The moderation of the moral Stroop effect by individual differences in concerns about personal cleanliness suggests that ideas about purity and pollution are central to seeing morality in black and white.
机译:三项研究检查了具有道德和不道德含义的单词以及黑色和白色之间的自动关联。在Stroop任务中,当黑色的单词关注道德(例如贪婪)而不是道德时,而白色的单词关注道德(例如诚实)而不是不道德时,命名速度更快。此外,通过让参与者手动复制不道德的陈述来引发不道德行为,从而加快了黑色字体中单词的识别速度。通过这种方式使不道德感突出,还可以增加以前没有表现出来的参与者的道德Stroop效应。在最终研究中,参与者还对消费产品进行了评分。在那些将个人清洁产品评为特别理想的参与者中,道德含义最严重地干扰了颜色命名。个人对个人清洁度的关注因个人差异而对道德Stroop效应的抑制作用表明,关于纯净和污染的观念对于看到黑白道德至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号