首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Palliative Medicine >Reliability and Validity of the Pediatric Palliative Care Questionnaire for Measuring Self-Efficacy Knowledge and Adequacy of Prior Medical Education among Pediatric Fellows
【2h】

Reliability and Validity of the Pediatric Palliative Care Questionnaire for Measuring Self-Efficacy Knowledge and Adequacy of Prior Medical Education among Pediatric Fellows

机译:儿科姑息治疗调查问卷在儿科研究员中进行自我医学教育的有效性和知识水平的信度和效度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Interventions to improve pediatric trainee education in palliative care have been limited by a lack of reliable and valid tools for measuring effectiveness.>Objective: We developed a questionnaire to measure pediatric fellows' self-efficacy (comfort), knowledge, and perceived adequacy of prior medical education. We measured the questionnaire's reliability and validity.>Methods: The questionnaire contains questions regarding self-efficacy (23), knowledge (10), fellow's perceived adequacy of prior medical education (6), and demographics. The survey was developed with palliative care experts, and sent to fellows in U.S. pediatric cardiology, critical care, hematology/ oncology, and neonatal-perinatal medicine programs. Measures of reliability, internal consistency, and validity were calculated.>Results: One hundred forty-seven fellows completed the survey at test and retest. The self-efficacy and medical education questionnaires showed high internal consistency of 0.95 and 0.84. The test-retest reliability for the Self-Efficacy Summary Score, measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted kappa, was 0.78 (item range 0.44–0.81) and 0.61 (item range 0.36–0.70), respectively. For the Adequacy of Medical Education Summary Score, ICC was 0.85 (item range 0.6–0.78) and weighted kappa was 0.63 (item range 0.47–0.62). Validity coefficients for these two questionnaires were 0.88 and 0.92. Fellows answered a mean of 8.8/10 knowledge questions correctly; percentage agreement ranged from 65% to 99%.>Conclusions: This questionnaire is capable of assessing self-efficacy and fellow-perceived adequacy of their prior palliative care training. We recommend use of this tool for fellowship programs seeking to evaluate fellow education in palliative care, or for research studies assessing the effectiveness of a palliative care educational intervention.
机译:>背景:由于缺乏可靠且有效的衡量有效性的工具,用于改善姑息治疗中的儿科实习生教育的干预措施受到了限制。>目的:我们开发了用于测量儿科医师的问卷自我医学(舒适),知识和先前医学教育的感知充分性。我们测量了问卷的信度和效度。>方法:问卷包含有关自我效能感(23),知识(10),同伴对先前医学教育的感知能力(6)和人口统计学的问题。该调查是由姑息治疗专家开发的,并发送给了美国儿科心脏病学,重症监护,血液学/肿瘤学和新生儿围产期医学计划的研究人员。计算了信度,内部一致性和有效性的度量。>结果:一百四十七名研究人员在测试和重新测试中完成了调查。自我效能和医学教育调查问卷显示内部一致性高,分别为0.95和0.84。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和加权kapp测得的自我效能概要分数的重测信度分别为0.78(项目范围0.44–0.81)和0.61(项目范围0.36-0.70)。对于医学教育总结分数的充分性,ICC为0.85(项目范围0.6-0.78),加权kappa为0.63(项目范围0.47-0.62)。这两个问卷的有效系数分别为0.88和0.92。研究员正确回答了8.8 / 10的知识问题。达成共识的百分比范围从65%到99%。>结论:该问卷能够评估他们以前的姑息治疗培训的自我效能和同伴感知的充分性。我们建议将此工具用于寻求评估姑息治疗同伴教育的奖学金计划,或用于评估姑息治疗教育干预措施有效性的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号