首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Palliative Medicine >International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care Position Statement: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide
【2h】

International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care Position Statement: Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide

机译:国际临终关怀和姑息治疗协会立场声明:安乐死和医师协助的自杀

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Reports about regulations and laws on Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS) are becoming increasingly common in the media. Many groups have expressed opposition to euthanasia and PAS while those in favor argue that severely chronically ill and debilitated patients have a right to control the timing and manner of their death. Others argue that both PAS and euthanasia are ethically legitimate in rare and exceptional cases. Given that these discussions as well as the new and proposed laws and regulations may have a powerful impact on patients, caregivers, and health care providers, the International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care (IAHPC) has prepared this statement.>Purpose: To describe the position of the IAHPC regarding Euthanasia and PAS.>Method: The IAHPC formed a working group (WG) of seven board members and two staff officers who volunteered to participate in this process. An online search was performed using the terms “position statement”, “euthanasia” “assisted suicide” “PAS” to identify existing position statements from health professional organizations. Only statements from national or pan-national associations were included. Statements from seven general medical and nursing associations and statements from seven palliative care organizations were identified. A working document including a summary of the different position statements was prepared and based on these, an initial draft was prepared. Online discussions among the members of the WG took place for a period of three months. The differences were reconciled by email discussions. The resulting draft was shared with the full board. Additional comments and suggestions were incorporated. This document represents the final version approved by the IAHPC Board of Directors.>Result: IAHPC believes that no country or state should consider the legalization of euthanasia or PAS until it ensures universal access to palliative care services and to appropriate medications, including opioids for pain and dyspnea.>Conclusion: In countries and states where euthanasia and/or PAS are legal, IAHPC agrees that palliative care units should not be responsible for overseeing or administering these practices. The law or policies should include provisions so that any health professional who objects must be allowed to deny participating.
机译:>背景:有关安乐死和医师协助自杀(PAS)的法规和法律的报道在媒体中越来越普遍。许多团体都表示反对安乐死和PAS,而赞成团体则认为,患有严重慢性疾病和虚弱的患者有权控制其死亡时间和方式。其他人则认为,在罕见和例外的情况下,PAS和安乐死在道德上都是合法的。鉴于这些讨论以及新的和拟议的法律法规可能会对患者,护理人员和医疗保健提供者产生重大影响,因此国际临终关怀和姑息治疗协会(IAHPC)编写了此声明。>目的: 描述IAHPC在安乐死和PAS方面的立场。>方法: IAHPC组成了一个由7名董事会成员和2名参谋人员自愿组成的工作组。使用“职位声明”,“安乐死”,“辅助自杀”,“ PAS”一词进行了在线搜索,以识别卫生专业组织的现有职位声明。仅包括来自国家或全民族协会的声明。确定了来自七个一般医疗和护理协会的声明以及来自七个姑息治疗组织的声明。编写了一份包括不同立场声明摘要的工作文件,并在此基础上编写了初步草案。工作组成员之间的在线讨论进行了三个月。电子邮件讨论调和了分歧。最终的草案已与全体董事会共享。纳入了其他意见和建议。本文档代表IAHPC董事会批准的最终版本。>结果:IAHPC认为,任何国家或州都不应考虑将安乐死或PAS合法化,直到确保普遍获得姑息治疗服务并适当>结论:在安乐死和/或PAS合法的国家和州,IAHPC同意姑息治疗部门不应负责监督或管理这些做法。法律或政策应包括规定,以便任何反对的卫生专业人员都应被拒绝参加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号