首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Neurophysiology >Sensory Processing: No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat
【2h】

Sensory Processing: No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat

机译:感官处理:暂时的有毒的热量没有减少只是暂时的对比度没有增强

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Offset analgesia (OA) studies have found that small decreases in the intensity of a tonic noxious heat stimulus yield a disproportionately large amount of pain relief. In the classic OA paradigm, the decrease in stimulus intensity is preceded by an increase of equal size from an initial noxious level. Although the majority of researchers believe this temporal sequence of two changes is important for eliciting OA, it has also been suggested that the temporal contrast mechanism underlying OA may enhance detection of simple, isolated decreases in noxious heat. To test whether decreases in noxious heat intensity, by themselves, are perceived better than increases of comparable sizes, we used an adaptive two-interval alternative forced choice task to find perceptual thresholds for increases and decreases in radiant and contact heat. Decreases in noxious heat were more difficult to perceive than increases of comparable sizes from the same initial temperature of 45°C. In contrast, decreases and increases were perceived equally well within a common range of noxious temperatures (i.e., when increases started from 45°C and decreases started from 47°C). In another task, participants rated the pain intensity of heat stimuli that randomly and unpredictably increased, decreased, or remained constant. Ratings of unpredictable stimulus decreases also showed no evidence of perceptual enhancement. Our results demonstrate that there is no temporal contrast enhancement of simple, isolated decreases in noxious heat intensity. Combined with previous OA findings, they suggest that long-lasting noxious stimuli that follow an increase-decrease pattern may be important for eliciting the OA effect.>NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous research suggested that a small decrease in noxious heat intensity feels surprisingly large because of sensory enhancement of noxious stimulus offsets (a simplified form of “offset analgesia”). Using a two-alternative forced choice task where participants detected simple increases or decreases in noxious heat, we showed that decreases in noxious heat, by themselves, are no better perceived than increases of comparable sizes. This suggests that a decrease alone is not sufficient to elicit offset analgesia.
机译:抵消性镇痛(OA)研究发现,滋补性有毒热刺激强度的小幅下降会产生不成比例的大量疼痛缓解。在经典的OA范式中,在刺激强度降低之前,先从初始有毒水平开始增加相等的大小。尽管大多数研究人员认为,这两种变化的时间顺序对于诱发OA很重要,但也有人提出,OA的时间对比机制可能会增强对有害热量简单,孤立的降低的检测。为了测试有害热强度的降低是否比可比尺寸的增加更好,我们使用了自适应两间隔替代性强制选择任务来寻找辐射和接触热的升高和降低的感知阈值。与相同的45°C初始温度相比,有害热量的减少比可比尺寸的增加要难得多。相反,在有毒温度的共同范围内(即,当增加从45℃开始而减少从47℃开始时),减少和增加被同等地感知。在另一项任务中,参与者对热刺激的疼痛强度进行了评估,该疼痛强度随机且不可预测地增加,减少或保持恒定。不可预测的刺激减少的等级也没有显示知觉增强的证据。我们的结果表明,有毒的热强度没有简单,孤立地降低的时间对比度增强。结合先前的OA研究结果,他们认为遵循增加-减少模式的持久有害刺激可能对诱发OA效应很重要。> NEW&NOTEWORTHY 先前的研究表明,有害热量的小幅下降由于有害刺激抵消(“抵消镇痛”的简化形式)的感觉增强,强度感觉令人惊讶地大。在参与者检测到有害热量简单增加或减少的情况下,使用两种选择的强制选择任务,我们表明,与可比尺寸的增加相比,有害热量减少本身没有更好的感觉。这表明单单减少不足以引起抵消性镇痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号