首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Bone and Mineral Research >True gold or pyrite: A review of reference point indentation for assessing bone mechanical properties in vivo
【2h】

True gold or pyrite: A review of reference point indentation for assessing bone mechanical properties in vivo

机译:真金或黄铁矿:用于评估体内骨骼力学性能的参考压痕的综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although the gold standard for determining bones’ mechanical integrity is the direct measure of mechanical properties, clinical evaluation has long relied on surrogates of mechanical properties for assessment of fracture risk. Nearly a decade ago, reference point indentation (RPI) emerged as an innovative way to potentially assess mechanical properties of bone in vivo. Beginning with the BioDent device, and then followed by the newer generation OsteoProbe, this RPI technology has emerged in several papers. In this review we overview the technology and some important details about the two devices. We also highlight select key studies, focused specifically on the in vivo application of these devices, as a way of synthesizing where the technology stands in 2015. The BioDent machine has been shown, in two clinical reports, to be able to differentiate fracture versus non-fracture patient populations and in preclinical studies to detect treatment effects that are consistent with those quantified using traditional mechanical tests. The OsteoProbe appears able to separate clinical cohorts yet there exists a lack of clarity regarding details of testing, which suggests more rigorous work needs to be undertaken with this machine. Taken together, RPI technology has shown promising results, yet much more work is needed to determine if its theoretical potential to assess mechanical properties in vivo can be realized.
机译:尽管确定骨骼机械完整性的金标准是机械性能的直接量度,但临床评估长期以来一直依赖于替代机械性能来评估骨折风险。大约十年前,参考点压痕(RPI)成为一种创新的方法,可以潜在地评估体内骨骼的机械性能。从BioDent设备开始,然后是新一代的OsteoProbe,这种RPI技术已经出现在几篇论文中。在本文中,我们概述了这两种设备的技术以及一些重要的细节。我们还重点介绍了选择的关键研究,这些研究专门针对这些设备的体内应用,以综合该技术在2015年的地位。在两项临床报告中,BioDent机器已证明能够区分骨折与非骨折。骨折患者群体,并在临床前研究中发现与传统机械测试量化的治疗效果一致的治疗效果。 OsteoProbe似乎能够区分临床人群,但是在测试细节方面缺乏明确性,这表明需要使用此机器进行更严格的工作。综上所述,RPI技术已经显示出令人鼓舞的结果,但是还需要做更多的工作来确定它的评估体内机械性能的理论潜力是否可以实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号