首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Physiology >Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model
【2h】

Augmentation index is not a proxy for wave reflection magnitude: mechanistic analysis using a computational model

机译:增强指数不能替代波反射幅度:使用计算模型的机械分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The augmentation index (AIx) is deemed to capture the deleterious effect on left ventricular (LV) work of increased wave reflection associated with stiffer arteries. However, its validity as a proxy for wave reflection magnitude has been questioned. We hypothesized that, in addition to increased wave reflection due to increased pulse wave velocity, LV myocardial shortening velocity influences AIx. Using a computational model of the circulation, we investigated the isolated and combined influences of myocardial shortening velocity vs,LV and arterial stiffness on AIx. Aortic blood pressure waveforms were characterized using AIx and the reflected wave pressure amplitude (p^bw, obtained using wave separation analysis). Our reference simulation (normal vs,LV and arterial stiffness) was characterized by an AIx of 21%. A realistic reduction in vs,LV caused AIx to increase from 21 to 42%. An arterial stiffness increase, characterized by a relevant 1.0 m/s increase in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, caused AIx to increase from 21 to 41%. Combining the reduced vs,LV and increased arterial stiffness resulted in an AIx of 54%. In a multistep parametric analysis, both vs,LV and arterial stiffness were about equal determinants of AIx, whereas p^bw was only determined by arterial stiffness. Furthermore, the relation between increased AIx and LV stroke work was only ≈50% explained by an increase in arterial stiffness, the other factor being vs,LV. The p^bw, on the other hand, related less ambiguously to LV stroke work. We conclude that the AIx reflects both cardiac and vascular properties and should not be considered an exclusively vascular parameter.>NEW & NOTEWORTHY We used a state-of-the-art computational model to mechanistically investigate the validity of the augmentation index (AIx) as a proxy for (changes in) wave reflection. In contrary to current belief, we found that LV contraction velocity influences AIx as much as increased arterial stiffness, and increased AIx does not necessarily relate to an increase in LV stroke work. Wave reflection magnitude derived from considering pressure, as well as flow, does qualify as a determinant of LV stroke work.
机译:增强指数(AIx)被认为捕获了与较硬的动脉相关的波反射增加对左心室(LV)功的有害作用。但是,其作为波反射幅度的替代品的有效性受到质疑。我们假设,除了由于脉搏波速度增加引起的波反射增加外,LV心肌缩短速度还会影响AIx。使用循环的计算模型,我们研究了心肌缩短速度vs,LV和动脉僵硬度对AIx的孤立和综合影响。使用AIx和反射波压力幅度( < mrow> p ^ bw (使用波分离分析获得)。我们的参考模拟(正常vs.LV和动脉僵硬)的AIx为21%。 vs.LV的实际降低导致AIx从21%增加到42%。动脉僵硬度的增加,其特征在于颈股动脉脉搏波速度增加了1.0 m / s,导致AIx从21%增加到41%。 vs.LV的降低和动脉僵硬度的增加共同导致AIx为54%。在多步参数分析中,vs,LV和动脉僵硬度大约等于AIx的决定因素,而 p ^ bw 仅由动脉僵硬度决定。此外,AIx升高与左室卒中之间的关系仅≈50%,这可以通过动脉僵硬度的增加来解释,另一个因素是vs.LV。 < mi> p ^ bw 手,与LV卒中工作的关系不太明显。我们得出的结论是,AIx反映了心脏和血管的特性,不应被视为排他性的血管参数。> NEW&NOTEWORTHY 我们使用了最新的计算模型来机械地研究AIx的有效性。增强指数(AIx)作为波反射(变化)的代理。与当前的观点相反,我们发现左心室收缩速度对AIx的影响与动脉僵硬度的增加一样多,而AIx的增加不一定与LV卒中功的增加有关。通过考虑压力以及流量得出的波反射幅度确实可以确定LV行程功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号