首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Gerontologist >The Evolution of an Academic–Community Partnership in the Design Implementation and Evaluation of Experience Corps® Baltimore City: A Courtship Model
【2h】

The Evolution of an Academic–Community Partnership in the Design Implementation and Evaluation of Experience Corps® Baltimore City: A Courtship Model

机译:设计实施和评估ExperienceCorps®巴尔的摩市的学术社区伙伴关系的演变:求爱模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: Experience Corps Baltimore City (EC) is a product of a partnership between the Greater Homewood Community Corporation (GHCC) and the Johns Hopkins Center on Aging and Health (COAH) that began in 1998. EC recruits volunteers aged 55 and older into high-impact mentoring and tutoring roles in public elementary schools that are designed to also benefit the volunteers. We describe the evolution of the GHCC–COAH partnership through the “Courtship Model.” >Design and Methods: We describe how community-based participatory research principals, such as shared governance, were applied at the following stages: (1) partner selection, (2) getting serious, (3) commitment, and (4) leaving a legacy. >Results: EC could not have achieved its current level of success without academic–community partnership. In early stages of the “Courtship Model,” GHCC and COAH were able to rely on the trust developed between the leadership of the partner organizations. Competing missions from different community and academic funders led to tension in later stages of the “Courtship Model” and necessitated a formal Memorandum of Understanding between the partners as they embarked on a randomized controlled trial. >Implications: The GHCC–COAH partnership demonstrates how academic–community partnerships can serve as an engine for social innovation. The partnership could serve as a model for other communities seeking multiple funding sources to implement similar public health interventions that are based on national service models. Unified funding mechanisms would assist the formation of academic–community partnerships that could support the design, implementation, and the evaluation of community-based public health interventions.
机译:>目的:体验团巴尔的摩市(EC)是美国大霍姆伍德社区公司(GHCC)与约翰·霍普金斯衰老与健康中心(COAH)之间于1998年开始合作的产物。 55岁及以上的志愿者在公立小学中担任重要的指导和辅导角色,旨在使志愿者受益。我们通过“赞助模式”描述GHCC-COAH合作关系的演变。 >设计与方法:我们描述了以下阶段如何应用基于社区的参与式研究原则(例如共享治理):( 1)选择合作伙伴,(2)认真对待,(3)承诺, (4)留下遗产。 >结果:没有学术界与社区的伙伴关系,EC不可能达到目前的成功水平。在“培训模式”的早期,GHCC和COAH能够依靠合作伙伴组织领导之间建立的信任。来自不同社区和学术资助者的竞争性任务导致了“赞助模式”后期的紧张关系,并且当合作伙伴开始进行随机对照试验时,他们之间需要正式的谅解备忘录。 >意义:GHCC-COAH合作伙伴关系展示了学术-社区合作伙伴关系可以如何充当社会创新的引擎。该伙伴关系可以作为其他社区寻求多种资金来源以实施基于国家服务模式的类似公共卫生干预措施的模型。统一的筹资机制将有助于建立学术-社区伙伴关系,从而支持基于社区的公共卫生干预措施的设计,实施和评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号