首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Epidemiology >Imputation approaches for potential outcomes in causal inference
【2h】

Imputation approaches for potential outcomes in causal inference

机译:因果推理中潜在结果的归因方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The fundamental problem of causal inference is one of missing data, and specifically of missing potential outcomes: if potential outcomes were fully observed, then causal inference could be made trivially. Though often not discussed explicitly in the epidemiological literature, the connections between causal inference and missing data can provide additional intuition.>Methods: We demonstrate how we can approach causal inference in ways similar to how we address all problems of missing data, using multiple imputation and the parametric g-formula.>Results: We explain and demonstrate the use of these methods in example data, and discuss implications for more traditional approaches to causal inference.>Conclusions: Though there are advantages and disadvantages to both multiple imputation and g-formula approaches, epidemiologists can benefit from thinking about their causal inference problems as problems of missing data, as such perspectives may lend new and clarifying insights to their analyses.
机译:>背景:因果推理的根本问题是缺少数据之一,尤其是缺少潜在结果的原因:如果充分观察到潜在结果,则可以轻而易举地进行因果推理。尽管在流行病学文献中通常没有明确讨论,但因果推断与缺失数据之间的联系可以提供额外的直觉。>方法:我们演示了如何以类似于解决所有问题的方式进行因果推断。 >结果:我们在示例数据中解释和演示了这些方法的使用,并讨论了对因果推理的更多传统方法的含义。>结论::尽管多重插补方法和g公式方法各有优缺点,但是流行病学家可以从因果推理问题(如数据丢失问题)中受益,因为这种观点可以为他们的分析提供新的思路,并为他们的分析提供新的思路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号