首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Human Vaccines Immunotherapeutics >Immunogenicity and safety of combined adsorbed low-dose diphtheria tetanus and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (REVAXIS®) versus combined diphtheria tetanus and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (DT Polio®) given as a booster dose at 6 years of age
【2h】

Immunogenicity and safety of combined adsorbed low-dose diphtheria tetanus and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (REVAXIS®) versus combined diphtheria tetanus and inactivated poliovirus vaccine (DT Polio®) given as a booster dose at 6 years of age

机译:低剂量白喉破伤风和灭活脊髓灰质炎灭活联合疫苗(REVAXIS®)与白喉破伤风和灭活脊髓灰质炎灭活脊髓灰质炎灭活联合疫苗(DTPolio®)在6岁时作为加强剂量的免疫原性和安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This randomized, comparative, phase-IIIb study conducted in France aimed to demonstrate whether seroprotection against diphtheria, tetanus and poliomyelitis 1 month after a single dose of REVAXIS (low-dose diphtheria) is non-inferior to seroprotection 1 month after a single dose of DT Polio (standard-dose diphtheria), both vaccines being given as a second booster to healthy children at 6 years of age. Children were randomly assigned to receive a single intramuscular dose of REVAXIS or DT Polio. Primary endpoints were the 1-month post-booster seroprotection rates for diphtheria, tetanus and poliovirus type-1, -2 and -3 antigens. Secondary endpoints were immunogenicity and safety observations. Of 788 children screened, 760 were randomized: REVAXIS group, 384 children; DT Polio group, 376 children. No relevant difference in demographic characteristics at baseline was observed between REVAXIS and DT Polio groups. Noninferiority of REVAXIS compared with DT Polio for seroprotection was demonstrated against diphtheria (respectively 98.6% and 99.3%), tetanus (respectively 99.6% and 100%) and poliovirus antigens (100% for each types in both groups). No allergic reactions to REVAXIS were reported. A benefit/risk ratio in favor of REVAXIS was suggested by the trend towards a better tolerability of REVAXIS compared with DT Polio regarding the rate of severe solicited injection-site reactions. The results support the use of REVAXIS as a booster at 6 years of age in infants who previously received a three-dose primary series within the first 6 months of life and a first booster including diphtheria, tetanus and poliovirus vaccine(s) given before 2 years of age.
机译:在法国进行的这项随机,比较,IIIb期研究旨在证明单剂REVAXIS(低剂量白喉)在1个月后对白喉,破伤风和小儿麻痹症的血清保护是否不劣于单剂REVAXIS在1个月后的血清保护。 DT脊髓灰质炎(标准剂量白喉),这两种疫苗都是6岁以下健康儿童的第二种疫苗。随机分配儿童接受肌肉内剂量的REVAXIS或DT脊髓灰质炎。主要终点指标是白喉,破伤风和脊髓灰质炎病毒1型,-2型和-3型抗原在加强免疫后1个月的血清保护率。次要终点是免疫原性和安全性观察。在筛选的788名儿童中,有760名被随机分组​​:REVAXIS组384名儿童; DT脊髓灰质炎小组有376名儿童。 REVAXIS和DT脊髓灰质炎组之间在基线时的人口统计学特征无相关差异。与白喉脊髓灰质炎相比,REVAXIS在血清保护方面具有非劣效性,可抵抗白喉(分别为98.6%和99.3%),破伤风(分别为99.6%和100%)和脊髓灰质炎病毒抗原(两组均为100%)。没有关于REVAXIS的过敏反应的报道。与严重的注射部位反应率相比,与DT Polio相比,REVAXIS具有更好的耐受性的趋势表明,有利于REVAXIS的获益/风险比。结果支持使用REVAXIS作为6岁以下初次加强免疫的婴儿,这些婴儿先前在生命的头6个月内接受了三剂量的初次系列免疫,并且首次加强了包括白喉,破伤风和脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗的初次免疫,包括2岁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号