首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Policy and Planning >How to assess and prepare health systems in low- and middle-income countries for integration of services—a systematic review
【2h】

How to assess and prepare health systems in low- and middle-income countries for integration of services—a systematic review

机译:如何评估和准备低收入和中等收入国家的卫生系统以整合服务—系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite growing support for integration of frontline services, a lack of information about the pre-conditions necessary to integrate such services hampers the ability of policy makers and implementers to assess how feasible or worthwhile integration may be, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We adopted a modified systematic review with aspects of realist review, including quantitative and qualitative studies that incorporated assessment of health system preparedness for and capacity to implement integrated services. We searched Medline via Ovid, Web of Science and the Cochrane library using terms adapted from Dudley and Garner’s systematic review on integration in LMICs. From an initial list of 10 550 articles, 206 were selected for full-text review by two reviewers who independently reviewed articles and inductively extracted and synthesized themes related to health system preparedness. We identified five ‘context’ related categories and four health system ‘capability’ themes. The contextual enabling and constraining factors for frontline service integration were: (1) the organizational framework of frontline services, (2) health care worker preparedness, (3) community and client preparedness, (4) upstream logistics and (5) policy and governance issues. The intersecting health system capabilities identified were the need for: (1) sufficiently functional frontline health services, (2) sufficiently trained and motivated health care workers, (3) availability of technical tools and equipment suitable to facilitate integrated frontline services and (4) appropriately devolved authority and decision-making processes to enable frontline managers and staff to adapt integration to local circumstances. Moving beyond claims that integration is defined differently by different programs and thus unsuitable for comparison, this review demonstrates that synthesis is possible. It presents a common set of contextual factors and health system capabilities necessary for successful service integration which may be considered indicators of preparedness and could form the basis for an ‘integration preparedness tool’.
机译:尽管越来越多的人支持整合一线服务,但缺乏有关整合此类服务所必需的前提条件的信息会妨碍决策者和实施者评估整合的可行性或价值,特别是在中低收入国家中(LMIC)。我们采用了经过修改的系统评估,其中包括现实评估的各个方面,包括定量和定性研究,这些评估纳入了对卫生系统准备状况和实施综合服务能力的评估。我们使用来自Dudley和Garner关于LMIC集成的系统评价改编而成的术语,通过Ovid,Web of Science和Cochrane库搜索了Medline。从最初的10 550篇文章列表中,选择了206篇文章进行全面审阅,这两名审稿人独立审阅文章并归纳出与卫生系统准备相关的主题。我们确定了五个与“上下文”相关的类别和四个卫生系统的“能力”主题。一线服务整合的背景因素是:(1)一线服务的组织框架;(2)医护人员的准备;(3)社区和客户的准备;(4)上游物流;(5)政策和治理问题。所确定的相互交叉的卫生系统能力是需要:(1)具有足够功能的一线医疗服务;(2)具有足够培训和积极性的医护人员;(3)有适合促进综合一线服务的技术工具和设备;以及(4)适当地下放权力和决策流程,以使一线经理和员工能够适应当地情况。除了声称由不同程序对集成进行了不同的定义,因此不适合进行比较之外,本综述还表明可以进行综合。它介绍了成功进行服务集成所必需的一组通用的背景因素和卫生系统功能,这些条件和指标可以被视为准备就绪的指标,并且可以构成“集成准备工作工具”的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号