首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology >Lack of effect of ovarian cycle and oral contraceptives on baroreceptor and nonbaroreceptor control of sympathetic nerve activity in healthy women
【2h】

Lack of effect of ovarian cycle and oral contraceptives on baroreceptor and nonbaroreceptor control of sympathetic nerve activity in healthy women

机译:卵巢周期和口服避孕药对健康女性交感神经活动的压力感受器和非压力感受器控制缺乏影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Endogenous and exogenous female hormones regulate sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in animal models, but their impact in humans is controversial. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the ovarian cycle and oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) on SNA. We hypothesized that the effects of endogenous hormones were baroreflex (BR)-mediated and that these cyclical changes in BR control were blunted by OCPs. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the nocturnal fall in blood pressure (BP) (“dipping”), which is sympathetically mediated, also varied with the ovarian cycle. In 23 healthy females (13 OCP users, 10 age-matched, no OCPs), SNA was recorded (microneurography) at rest, during BR activation/deactivation, and cold pressor test (CPT) during low and high hormonal phases. Furthermore, 24-h BP monitoring was performed during low and high hormonal phases. SNA was lower during the low vs. high hormone phase in non-OCP users (17.3 ± 2.4 vs. 25.4 ± 3.2 bursts/min, P < 0.001) but was not different between phases in OCP users [15.5 ± 1.7 vs. 16.6 ± 2.0 bursts/min, P = not significant (NS)]. BR control of SNA was not different during the hormone phases in either group [SNA (total activity/min) mean slope %change from baseline, no OCP users, low vs. high hormone phase 35.4 ± 6.2 vs. 29.6 ± 3.4%, P = NS and OCP users, low vs. high hormone phase 35.7 ± 3.9 vs. 33.5 ± 3.5%, P = NS]. SNA activation during CPT was not impacted by hormonal phase or OCP use. Finally, nondipping was not different between OCP users and nonusers, although there was a trend for nondipping to occur more frequently in the OCP users. SNA varies during the ovarian cycle in women in the absence of OCPs. This modulation cannot be attributed to cyclical changes in the BR sensitivity.
机译:内源性和外源性雌性激素调节动物模型中的交感神经活动(SNA),但它们对人类的影响尚存争议。这项研究的目的是调查卵巢周期和口服避孕药(OCP)对SNA的影响。我们假设内源激素的作用是压力反射(BR)介导的,并且BR控制的这些周期性变化被OCP抑制了。此外,我们假设通过交感神经介导的夜间血压下降(BP)(“浸入”)也随卵巢周期而变化。在23位健康女性(13位OCP用户,10位年龄相匹配的患者,没有OCP)中,在低,高激素阶段,在BR激活/失活以及静压测试(CPT)期间,静止时记录了SNA(微神经造影)。此外,在低激素阶段和高激素阶段均进行了24小时BP监测。非OCP用户在低激素阶段与高激素阶段相比,SNA较低(17.3±2.4 vs. 25.4±3.2突发/分钟,P <0.001),但在OCP用户阶段之间无差异[15.5±1.7与16.6± 2.0次/分钟,P =不显着(NS)]。两组中的激素阶段,SNA的BR控制均无差异[SNA(总活性/分钟)相对于基线的平均斜率变化百分比,无OCP使用者,激素水平由低到高分别为35.4±6.2和29.6±3.4%,P = NS和OCP使用者,激素水平从低到高分别为35.7±3.9和33.5±3.5%,P = NS]。 CPT期间的SNA激活不受激素阶段或OCP使用的影响。最后,OCP用户和非用户之间的不浸没也没有区别,尽管有一种趋势是OCP用户中更经常发生不浸。在没有OCP的女性中,卵巢周期中的SNA有所不同。此调制不能归因于BR灵敏度的周期性变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号