首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Family Practice >Electronic information and clinical decision support for prescribing: state of play in Australian general practice
【2h】

Electronic information and clinical decision support for prescribing: state of play in Australian general practice

机译:处方的电子信息和临床决策支持:澳大利亚一般实践的现状

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. Investments in eHealth worldwide have been mirrored in Australia, with >90% of general practices computerized. Recent eHealth incentives promote the use of up to date electronic information sources relevant to general practice with flexibility in mode of access.>Objective. To determine GPs’ access to and use of electronic information sources and computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) for prescribing.>Methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 experienced GPs and nine GP trainees in New South Wales, Australia in 2008. A thematic analysis of interview transcripts was undertaken.>Results. Information needs varied with clinical experience, and people resources (specialists, GP peers and supervisors for trainees) were often preferred over written formats. Experienced GPs used a small number of electronic resources and accessed them infrequently. Familiarity from training and early clinical practice and easy access were dominant influences on resource use. Practice time constraints meant relevant information needed to be readily accessible during consultations, requiring integration or direct access from prescribing software. Quality of electronic resource content was assumed and cost a barrier for some GPs.>Conclusions. The current Australian practice incentives do not prescribe which information resources GPs should use. Without integration into practice computing systems, uptake and routine use seem unlikely. CDSS developments must recognize the time pressures of practice, preference for integration and cost concerns. Minimum standards are required to ensure that high-quality information resources are integrated and regularly updated. Without standards, the anticipated benefits of computerization on patient safety and health outcomes will be uncertain.
机译:>背景。全球对eHealth的投资已反映在澳大利亚,超过90%的常规做法已计算机化。最新的eHealth激励措施以灵活的访问方式促进了与一般实践有关的最新电子信息源的使用。>目标。确定全科医生对电子信息源和计算机化临床决策支持的访问和使用>方法。 2008年,在澳大利亚新南威尔士州对18名经验丰富的GP和9名GP学员进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈笔录进行了主题分析。 >结果。信息需求随临床经验的不同而变化,与书面形式相比,人力资源(专家,GP同行和受训学员的主管)通常更受青睐。有经验的GP会使用少量的电子资源,并且很少访问它们。培训和早期临床实践的熟悉程度以及易于获取是对资源使用的主要影响。实践时间的限制意味着在咨询过程中需要容易获得相关信息,需要从处方软件中进行集成或直接访问。假定电子资源内容的质量会对某些GP构成障碍。>结论。当前的澳大利亚惯例激励措施并未规定GP应该使用哪些信息资源。如果不集成到实践计算系统中,吸收和常规使用似乎不太可能。 CDSS的发展必须认识到实践的时间压力,对集成的偏爱和成本问题。需要最低标准来确保集成和定期更新高质量的信息资源。没有标准,计算机化对患者安全和健康结果的预期收益将是不确定的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号