首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Childhood Obesity >Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Overweight and Obese Children
【2h】

Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk between Insulin-Sensitive and Insulin-Resistant Overweight and Obese Children

机译:胰岛素敏感性和胰岛素抵抗性超重与肥胖儿童之间心脏代谢风险的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: It is known that 15–30% overweight/obese adults do not suffer cardiometabolic consequences. There is limited literature examining factors that can be used to assess cardiometabolic health in overweight/obese children. If such factors can be identified, they would aid in differentiating those most in need for aggressive management.>Methods: Baseline data from 7- to 12-year-old, overweight, and obese children enrolled in a weight management program at an urban hospital were analyzed. Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) <2.6 was used to define insulin-sensitive and HOMA-IR ≥2.6 was used to defined insulin-resistant participants. Demographics, physical activity measures, and cardiometabolic risk factors were compared between the two phenotypes. Odds ratios (ORs) examining the association between intermediate endpoints (metabolic syndrome [MetS], nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD], systemic inflammation, and microalbuminuria) and the two metabolic phenotypes were evaluated.>Results: Of the 362 overweight/obese participants, 157 (43.5%) were insulin sensitive and 204 (56.5%) were insulin resistant. Compared to the insulin-sensitive group, the insulin-resistant group was older (8.6±1.6 vs. 9.9±1.7; p<0.001) and had a higher BMI z-score (1.89±0.42 vs. 2.04±0.42; p=0.001). After multivariable adjustment, compared to the insulin-sensitive group, the insulin-resistant group had higher odds of having MetS (OR, 5.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.72, 17.35; p=0.004) and NAFLD (OR, 8.66; 95% CI, 2.48, 30.31; p=0.001), but not systemic inflammation (OR, 1.06; 95% CI: 0.56, 2.03; p=0.86) or microalbuminuria (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 0.49, 6.04; p=0.403).>Conclusions: Using a HOMA-IR value of ≥2.6, clinical providers can identify prepubertal and early pubertal children most at risk. Focusing limited resources on aggressive weight interventions may lead to improvement in cardiometabolic health.
机译:>背景:众所周知,超重/肥胖的成年人中有15-30%不会遭受心脏代谢的后果。很少有文献检查可用于评估超重/肥胖儿童心脏代谢健康状况的因素。如果可以识别出这些因素,它们将有助于区分那些最需要积极管理的人。>方法:参加体重调查的7至12岁,超重和肥胖儿童的基线数据分析了城市医院的管理计划。胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)<2.6用于定义胰岛素敏感性,而HOMA-IR≥2.6用于定义胰岛素抵抗参与者。比较了两种表型的人口统计学,体育活动量度和心脏代谢危险因素。评价了中间终点(代谢综合征[MetS],非酒精性脂肪肝病[NAFLD],全身性炎症和微量白蛋白尿)与两种代谢表型之间关联的几率(OR)。>结果: 362名超重/肥胖参与者中,有157名(43.5%)对胰岛素敏感,有204名(56.5%)对胰岛素抵抗。与胰岛素敏感性组相比,胰岛素抵抗组年龄更大(8.6±1.6 vs. 9.9±1.7; p <0.001),并且BMI z评分更高(1.89±0.42 vs. 2.04±0.42; p = 0.001 )。经过多变量调整后,与胰岛素敏感性组相比,胰岛素抵抗组发生MetS(OR,5.47; 95%置信区间[CI]:1.72,17.35; p = 0.004)和NAFLD(OR,8.66)的几率更高; 95%CI,2.48,30.31; p = 0.001),但不是全身性炎症(OR,1.06; 95%CI:0.56,2.03; p = 0.86)或微量白蛋白尿(OR,1.71; 95%CI,0.49,6.04;或p = 0.403)。>结论:临床医生使用HOMA-IR值≥2.6可以识别风险最高的青春期前和青春期早期儿童。将有限的资源用于积极的体重干预可能会改善心脏代谢健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号