首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH >Comparison of anchorage loss following initialleveling and aligning using ROTH and MBT Prescription – A clinicalprospective study
【2h】

Comparison of anchorage loss following initialleveling and aligning using ROTH and MBT Prescription – A clinicalprospective study

机译:初始后锚固损失的比较使用ROTH和MBT处方进行水平和对齐的方法–临床前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: To evaluate the amount and percentage of anchor loss after initial leveling and aligning using a ROTH and MBT prescription. >Materials & Methods: Pre and post alignment lateral cephalograms & dental casts of 10 ROTH & 10 MBT patients. >Results: In the study, it was found that the amount of anchor loss is greater in the ROTH group than the MBT group. This could be due to the increased anterior tip in the ROTH prescription, compared to MBT. The total anterior tip in ROTH is 270 and in MBT is 200. The additional tip of 70 in ROTH prescription itself would have resulted in forward thrust of the anteriors. >Conclusion: The use of laceback and cinchbacks creates a statistically and clinically significant increase in the anchorage loss specificallywhen the posterior anchorage is not enhanced. In this study TPA wasnot used but studies have shown that passive TPA has almost noeffect on the clinician's need to preserve anchorage in thecorrection of malocclusion. On the other hand, the TPA is anexcellent way to prevent molar rotation and maintain the originalvertical and transverse dimension when desired.>How to cite the article:Rajesh M, Kishore MS, Shetty KS. Comparison of anchorage lossfollowing initial leveling and aligning using ROTH and MBTPrescription – A clinical prospective study. J Int Oral Health2014;6(2):16-21.
机译:>背景:使用ROTH和MBT处方评估初始找平和对齐后锚固损失的数量和百分比。 >材料和方法: 10位ROTH和10 MBT患者的对齐前后侧位头颅造影和牙模。 >结果:在该研究中,发现ROTH组的锚固丢失量比MBT组大。与MBT相比,这可能是由于ROTH处方中的前尖端增加。 ROTH的前尖端总数为270,MBT的前尖端总数为200。在ROTH处方中,另外70的尖端本身会导致向前的前推力。 >结论:系背带和背带背带的使用在统计学上和临床上都会明显增加锚固损失当后固定不增强时。在这项研究中,TPA为未使用,但研究表明被动TPA几乎没有对临床医生保持锚固的影响错位矫正。另一方面,TPA是防止磨牙旋转并保持原状的绝佳方法如果需要,可以使用垂直和横向尺寸。>如何引用该文章:Rajesh M,Kishore女士,Shetty KS。锚固损失比较使用ROTH和MBT进行初始调平和对齐之后处方–临床前瞻性研究。国际口腔卫生2014; 6(2):16-21。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号