首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brain >Acute withdrawal and botulinum toxin A in chronic migraine with medication overuse: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Acute withdrawal and botulinum toxin A in chronic migraine with medication overuse: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

机译:慢性偏头痛急性停药和肉毒杆菌毒素A过度用药:一项双盲随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Botulinum toxin A (BTA) is widely used as treatment of chronic migraine. Efficacy in studies, however, was only modest and likely influenced by unblinding due to BTA-induced removal of forehead wrinkles. Moreover, most study participants were overusing acute headache medications and might have benefitted from withdrawal. We assessed in a double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial whether add-on therapy with BTA enhances efficacy of acute withdrawal. Participants were enrolled between December 2012 and February 2015, with follow-up to January 2016, in a single academic hospital in the Netherlands. A total of 179 participants, male and female, aged 18–65, diagnosed with chronic migraine and overuse of acute headache medication were included. All participants were instructed to withdraw acutely from all medication for a 12-week period, in an outpatient setting. In addition, they were randomly assigned (1:1) to 31 injections with BTA (155 units) or placebo (saline); to prevent unblinding, placebo-treated participants received low doses of BTA (17.5 units in total) in the forehead, along with saline injections outside the forehead region. Primary endpoint was percentage change in monthly headache days from baseline to the last 4 weeks of double-blind treatment (Weeks 9–12). Among 179 randomized patients, 90 received BTA and 89 received placebo, and 175 (98%) completed the double-blind phase. All 179 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. BTA did not reduce monthly headache days versus placebo (−26.9% versus −20.5%; difference −6.4%; 95% confidence interval: −15.2 to 2.4; P = 0.15). Absolute changes in migraine days at 12 weeks for BTA versus placebo were −6.2 versus −7.0 (difference: 0.8; 95% confidence interval: −1.0 to 2.7; P = 0.38). Other secondary endpoints, including measures for disability and quality of life, did also not differ. Withdrawal was well tolerated and blinding was successful. Thus, in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse, BTA does not afford any additional benefit over acute withdrawal alone. Acute withdrawal should be tried first before initiating more expensive treatment with BTA.
机译:肉毒杆菌毒素A(BTA)被广泛用于治疗慢性偏头痛。然而,由于BTA引起的前额皱纹的去除,研究的功效仅是中等程度的,并且可能受到失明的影响。此外,大多数研究参与者过度使用了急性头痛药物,可能从戒断中受益。我们在一项双盲,安慰剂对照,随机临床试验中评估了BTA的附加疗法是否能增强急性戒断的疗效。参加者于2012年12月至2015年2月之间,并随访至2016年1月,在荷兰的一家学术医院参加。总共包括179名年龄在18-65岁之间的男性和女性,被诊断出患有慢性偏头痛和过度使用急性头痛药物。在门诊环境中,所有参与者均被指示在12周内紧急停用所有药物。此外,他们被随机分配(1:1)进行31次BTA(155单位)或安慰剂(盐水)注射;为了防止失明,接受安慰剂治疗的参与者的额头接受了低剂量的BTA(总共17.5个单位),并且在额头区域以外注射了盐水。主要终点是从基线到双盲治疗的最后4周,每月头痛天的百分比变化(第9-12周)。在179名随机分组的患者中,有90名接受了BTA,89名接受了安慰剂,其中175名(98%)完成了双盲阶段。所有179例患者都包括在意向治疗分析中。与安慰剂相比,BTA没有减少每月头痛的天数(−26.9%比−20.5%;差异−6.4%; 95%置信区间:-15.2至2.4; P = 0.15)。 BTA与安慰剂相比,第12周偏头痛天数的绝对变化为-6.2对-7.0(差异:0.8; 95%置信区间:-1.0至2.7; P = 0.38)。其他次要终点,包括残疾和生活质量的衡量标准,也没有差异。撤离耐受性良好,致盲成功。因此,在患有慢性偏头痛和药物过度使用的患者中,BTA不能提供比单纯急性戒断所产生的任何其他好处。在开始使用BTA进行更昂贵的治疗之前,应首先尝试急性停药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号