首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine >An Empirical Study of Surrogates Preferred Level of Control over Value-laden Life Support Decisions in Intensive Care Units
【2h】

An Empirical Study of Surrogates Preferred Level of Control over Value-laden Life Support Decisions in Intensive Care Units

机译:代理人对重症监护病房重载生命支持决策的首选控制水平的实证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rationale: Despite ongoing ethical debate concerning who should control decisions to discontinue life support for incapacitated, critically ill patients, the perspectives of surrogate decision makers are poorly understood.Objectives: To determine (1) what degree of decisional authority surrogates prefer for value-sensitive life support decisions compared with more technical biomedical decisions, and (2) what predicts surrogates' preferences for more control over life support decisions.Methods: This was a prospective study of 230 surrogate decision makers for incapacitated, mechanically ventilated patients at high risk of death. Surrogates reported their preferred degree of decisional authority using the Degner Control Preferences Scale for two types of decisions: a value-sensitive decision about whether to discontinue life support and a decision regarding which antibiotic to prescribe for an infection.Measurements and Main Results: The majority of surrogates (55%, 127/230; 95% confidence interval, 49–62%) preferred to have final control over the value-sensitive life support decision; 40% (91/230) wished to share control equally with the physician; 5% (12/230) of surrogates wanted the physician to make the decision. Surrogates preferred significantly more control over the value-sensitive life support decision compared with the technical decision about choice of antibiotics (P < 0.0001). Factors independently associated with surrogates' preference for more control over the life support decision were: less trust in the intensive care unit physician, male sex, and non-Catholic religious affiliation.Conclusions: Surrogates vary in their desire for decisional authority for value-sensitive life support decisions, but prefer substantially more authority for this type of decision compared with technical, medical judgments. Low trust in physicians is associated with surrogates preferring more control of life support decisions.
机译:理由:尽管关于谁应控制决策以终止对丧失能力的重症患者的生命支持的伦理辩论仍在进行,但代孕决策者的观点仍知之甚少。目的:确定(1)对于价值敏感型,决策权威代孕的程度生命支持决策与更先进的生物医学决策相比;(2)预测代孕者倾向于更好地控制生命支持决策的方法。方法:这是对230名代孕决策者进行的前瞻性研究,这些决策者是无行为能力,机械通气的高死亡风险患者。代理人使用Degner控制偏好量表对两种类型的决策报告了他们偏好的决策权限:两种是对价值敏感的决定是否终止生命支持的决定,另一种是决定使用哪种抗生素进行感染的决定。测量和主要结果:多数倾向于对价值敏感型生命支持决策具有最终控制权的代理人(55%,127/230; 95%置信区间,49-62%); 40%(91/230)希望与医生平均分享控制权; 5%(12/230)的代理人希望医生做出决定。与选择抗生素的技术决策相比,代理人更希望对价值敏感型生命支持决策有更多的控制权(P <0.0001)。与代理人更倾向于控制生命支持决策相关的独立因素有:对重症监护病房医生的信任度降低,男性和非天主教宗教信仰。结论:代理人对价值敏感的决策机构的渴望有所不同生命支持决策,但与技术,医学判断相比,这种决策的权限要高得多。对医生的信任度低与代孕妈妈倾向于更好地控制生命支持决策有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号