首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biomedical Reports >Pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone improves the efficacy of ibutilide treatment on cardioversion rate and maintenance time of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
【2h】

Pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone improves the efficacy of ibutilide treatment on cardioversion rate and maintenance time of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

机译:静脉胺碘酮预处理可提高依布利特治疗对持续性心房纤颤患者心脏复律率和窦性心律维持时间的疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the pharmacological conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using amiodarone or/and ibutilide. Seventy-nine consecutive patients (48 males and 31 females; mean age, 64.6±11.2 years; range, 40–80 years) with non-valvular chronic AF lasting >7 days (range, 7–97 days) that were admitted to hospital for elective pharmacological cardioversion were randomly assigned to receive treatment with intravenous ibutilide (1 mg plus an additional 1 mg if required; n=39) or intravenous amiodarone (300 mg) plus intravenous ibutilide (1 mg; n=40). Success rates of cardioversion were 51.3% (20/39 patients) for ibutilide alone and 71.8% (28/39 patients) for amiodarone + ibutilide (P<0.05). A comparable increase in the QTc interval was observed in the two groups. It was observed that the co-administration of amiodarone and ibutilide was safer than ibutilide alone with regard to the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Forty-eight patients of successful cardioversion were personally contacted for follow-up. The result indicated that the sinus rhythm maintenance time of the amiodarone + ibutilide group (4.36±2.44 months) was significantly higher than that of the ibutilide group (2.34±1.75 months; P<0.01). In conclusion, pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone + ibutilide for pharmacological cardioversion of persistent AF is considered to be more effective and safer than treatment with ibutilide alone.
机译:本研究的目的是评估使用胺碘酮或/和依布利特进行持续性心房纤颤(AF)药理学转换的功效和安全性。连续住院但持续时间> 7天(范围:7-97天)的非瓣膜性慢性AF的连续患者79例(男48例,女31例;平均年龄64.6±11.2岁;范围40-80岁)对于选择性药物复律的患者,随机分配接受静脉依布利特(1 mg,如果需要,还可加1 mg; n = 39)或静脉胺碘酮(300 mg)加静脉依布利特(1 mg; n = 40)进行治疗。单独使用依布利特的复律成功率为51.3%(20/39例),对于胺碘酮+依布利特的复律成功率为71.8%(28/39例)(P <0.05)。在两组中观察到QTc间隔的可比增加。据观察,就心律失常的风险而言,胺碘酮和伊布利特的共同给药比单独的伊布利特更安全。亲自联系了成功复律的48例患者进行随访。结果表明,胺碘酮+伊布利特组的窦性心律维持时间(4.36±2.44个月)显着高于伊布利特组(2.34±1.75个月; P <0.01)。总之,与单独使用依布利特治疗相比,静脉给予胺碘酮+依布特利治疗持续性房颤的药理心脏复律被认为更有效,更安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号