首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine >An Official American Thoracic Society Systematic Review: The Association between Health Insurance Status and Access Care Delivery and Outcomes for Patients Who Are Critically Ill
【2h】

An Official American Thoracic Society Systematic Review: The Association between Health Insurance Status and Access Care Delivery and Outcomes for Patients Who Are Critically Ill

机译:官方美国胸科学会系统评价:健康保险状态与严重疾病患者的就诊护理提供和结果之间的关联

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Rationale: One in three Americans under 65 years of age does not have health insurance during some portion of each year. Patients who are critically ill and lack health insurance may be at particularly high risk of morbidity and mortality due to the high cost of intensive care.Objectives: To systematically review the medical and nonmedical literature to determine whether differences in critical care access, delivery, and outcomes are associated with health insurance status.Methods: Nine electronic databases (inception to 11 April 2008) were independently screened and abstracted in duplicate.Measurements and Main Results: From 5,508 citations, 29 observational studies met eligibility criteria. Among the general U.S. population, patients who were uninsured were less likely to receive critical care services than those with insurance (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55–0.56). Once admitted to the intensive care unit, patients who were uninsured had 8.5% (95% CI, 6.0–11.1) fewer procedures, were more likely to experience hospital discharge delays (OR 4.51; 95% CI, 1.46–13.93), and were more likely to have life support withdrawn (OR 2.80; 95% CI, 1.12–7.02). Lack of insurance may confer an independent risk of death for patients who are critically ill (OR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01–1.33). Patients in managed care systems had 14.3% (95% CI, 11.5–17.2) fewer procedures in intensive care, but were also less likely to receive “potentially ineffective” care. Differences in unmeasured confounding factors may contribute to these findings.Conclusions: Patients in the United States who are critically ill and do not have health insurance receive fewer critical care services and may experience worse clinical outcomes. Improving preexisting health care coverage, as opposed to solely delivering more critical care services, may be one mechanism to reduce such disparities.
机译:理由:65岁以下的美国人中有三分之一在每年的某些部分中没有医疗保险。重症监护病患和缺乏健康保险的患者由于重症监护的高昂费用而可能具有特别高的发病率和死亡率。目的:系统地审查医学和非医学文献以确定在重症监护的获得,提供和治疗方面是否存在差异方法:对9个电子数据库(从成立到2008年4月11日)进行独立筛选,一式两份进行摘要。测量和主要结果:从5508次引用中,有29项观察研究符合资格标准。在美国一般人群中,没有保险的患者接受重症监护服务的可能性低于有保险的患者(优势比[OR]为0.56; 95%置信区间[CI]为0.55-0.56)。一旦进入重症监护病房,没有保险的患者的手术程序减少了8.5%(95%CI,6.0-11.1),更有可能经历出院延误(OR 4.51; 95%CI,1.46-13.93),并且撤消生命支持的可能性更大(OR 2.80; 95%CI,1.12-7.02)。缺乏保险可能会给重病患者带来独立的死亡风险(OR 1.16; 95%CI,1.01-1.33)。管理式护理系统中的患者在重症监护中的程序减少了14.3%(95%CI,11.5-17.2),但接受“潜在无效”护理的可能性也较小。结论:结论:在美国,重病且没有健康保险的患者获得的重症监护服务较少,临床结局可能更差。与仅提供更多的重症监护服务相反,改善现有的医疗保健覆盖范围可能是减少这种差异的一种机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号