首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Epidemiology >Invited Commentary: Invited Commentary: The Search for Preventable Causes of Cardiovascular Disease—Whither Work?
【2h】

Invited Commentary: Invited Commentary: The Search for Preventable Causes of Cardiovascular Disease—Whither Work?

机译:受邀评论:受邀评论:寻找可预防的心血管疾病原因-从事哪些工作?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The incidence and mortality of the major cardiovascular disorders vary sharply by occupation, but this is usually attributed to broad socioeconomic factors; the contributions of physical and psychosocial stressors at work remain obscure or controversial. Review of the ongoing studies of cardiovascular disease in the United States in this issue of the Journal demonstrates that few have either collected sufficient occupational data or used these data in published analyses to address this issue. There are compelling reasons to study this issue, starting with the sheer magnitude of the occupational gradient and disease prevalence. If only 5%–15% prove causally linked to preventable factors, an enormous disease-control opportunity would present itself. Moreover, the most suspect work factors—job stress, fine particulate dust, heat, noise, and shiftwork—are highly prevalent in the US workforce. Thankfully, there is evidence that many of the large ongoing studies are moving toward enhancing their occupational data and using what they have already collected. However, because of the complexity of studying these relations, the better solution is not retrofitting but designing studies in the future that combine de novo the conceptual frameworks and technical skills of occupational and social epidemiologists with those of more biologically focused investigators.
机译:主要职业的心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率因职业而异,但这通常归因于广泛的社会经济因素;在工作中,生理和心理压力源的贡献仍然不清楚或存在争议。在本期《华尔街日报》上对美国正在进行的心血管疾病研究的回顾表明,很少有人收集足够的职业数据或在发表的分析中使用这些数据来解决这一问题。有充分的理由来研究这个问题,首先是从职业梯度的绝对数量和疾病的流行率开始。如果只有5%–15%被证明与可预防的因素有因果关系,那么巨大的疾病控制机会将会出现。此外,最可疑的工作因素-工作压力,细小的粉尘,热量,噪音和轮班工作-在美国劳动力中非常普遍。值得庆幸的是,有证据表明,许多正在进行的大型研究正在朝着增强其职业数据和使用他们已经收集的数据的方向发展。但是,由于研究这些关系的复杂性,更好的解决方案不是改型,而是设计将来的研究,这些研究应将职业和社会流行病学家的概念框架和技术技能与生物学重点更强的研究人员结合起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号