首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Cancer >The PANDA study: a randomized phase II study of first-line FOLFOX plus panitumumab versus 5FU plus panitumumab in RAS and BRAF wild-type elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients
【2h】

The PANDA study: a randomized phase II study of first-line FOLFOX plus panitumumab versus 5FU plus panitumumab in RAS and BRAF wild-type elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients

机译:PANDA研究:RAS和BRAF野生型老年转移性结直肠癌患者中一线FOLFOX加帕尼单抗与5FU加帕尼单抗的II期随机研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundFew data are available regarding the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer elderly patients with anti-EGFR agents in combination with chemotherapy. FOLFOX plus panitumumab is a standard first-line option for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Slight adjustments in chemo-dosage are commonly applied in clinical practice to elderly patients, but those modified schedules have never been prospectively tested. Clinical definition of elderly (≥70 years old) patients that may deserve a more or less intensive combination therapy is still debated. Several geriatric screening tools have been developed to predict survival and risk of toxicity from treatment. Among those, the G8 screening tool has been tested in cancer patients showing the strongest prognostic value for overall survival, while the CRASH score can stratify patients according to an estimated risk of treatment-related toxicities.
机译:背景很少有关于抗EGFR药物联合化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌老年患者的数据。 FOLFOX加帕尼单抗是RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌的标准一线选择。对化学剂量的轻微调整通常在老年患者的临床实践中应用,但从未对这些修改后的时间表进行过前瞻性测试。老年人(≥70岁)可能应或多或少进行强化联合治疗的临床定义仍存在争议。已经开发了几种老人筛查工具来预测治疗的存活率和毒性风险。其中,G8筛查工具已在癌症患者中进行了测试,显示出对整体生存的最强预后价值,而CRASH评分可根据估计的与治疗相关的毒性风险对患者进行分层。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号