首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica >Failure to Use Cubicles and Concentrate Dispenser by Heifers after Transfer from Rearing Accommodation to Milking Herd
【2h】

Failure to Use Cubicles and Concentrate Dispenser by Heifers after Transfer from Rearing Accommodation to Milking Herd

机译:从饲养场转移到奶牛场后小母牛未使用小隔间和浓缩液分配器

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Thirty-three dairy farms in the Norwegian counties of Østfold and Akershus in which cubicle sheds had been in use for at least one year and with a herd size of less than 60 cows, were contacted and asked to participate in a study. The study focused on heifers' use of cubicles and concentrate dispenser just after being transferred from rearing accommodation to the milking herd. For each heifer, the farmer recorded cubicle use once nightly between 9 and 11 pm. The daily amount of concentrate released in the dispenser and the allotted daily ration were also recorded. The recording period was 15 consecutive days for cubicle use and 7 days for concentrate dispenser use. Cubicle refusal behaviour, i.e. lying outside the cubicles, was analysed by logistic regression using rearing accommodation of heifers, herd size, heifer age, and housing layout as independent variables, and herd as a clustering variable. On Day 2 after transfer, 34% of the heifers were showing cubicle refusal behaviour (N = 340). By Day 15 this percentage had dropped to 23. Cubicle refusal was lower throughout the whole period among heifers which used the cubicles on the 3 first days after transfer compared to those which did not. This tendency could also be detected several months later. The analysis showed cubicle refusal to be significantly associated with rearing accommodation (OR = 6.1, c.i.95%OR = 1.5–24.3, P = 0.01) and cubicle layout in the shed (OR = 0.2, c.i.95%OR = 0.0–0.7, P = 0.01). None of the tested variables were found to be significant for failure to use the concentrate dispenser, a behaviour which was less frequent than cubicle refusal. However, 8 percent of the heifers did not visit the dispenser at all throughout the 7 days of observation.
机译:与挪威的Østfold县和Akershus县的33个奶牛场联系起来,并要求他们参加研究,在这些奶牛场中,小棚棚已经使用了至少一年,而牛群的大小不足60头。该研究的重点是刚从饲养房转移到挤奶牛群后,小母牛使用小隔间和浓缩液分配器。对于每个小母牛,农民记录晚上9点至晚上11点之间每晚一次的小隔间使用情况。还记录了在分配器中释放的每日浓缩物量和分配的每日定量。对于小隔间,记录时间是连续15天,对于浓缩液分配器,记录时间是7天。小牛拒绝行为,即躺在小隔间之外,通过逻辑回归分析,以饲养小母牛的住所,畜群大小,小母牛的年龄和房屋布局为自变量,以畜群为聚类变量。转移后第2天,有34%的小母牛表现出隔间拒绝行为(N = 340)。到第15天,该百分比下降到23。在整个期间,拒绝使用小母牛的小母牛在转移后的前3天使用小卧室的比例低于未使用小母牛的小母牛。几个月后也可以检测到这种趋势。分析显示,隔间的拒绝与饲养条件(OR = 6.1,ci95%OR = 1.5–24.3,P = 0.01)和棚屋中的隔间布局(OR = 0.2,ci95%OR = 0.0–0.7, P = 0.01)。没有发现任何测试变量对不使用浓缩液分配器有重大意义,这种行为比隔间拒绝的频率要低。但是,在整个观察的7天中,只有8%的小母牛根本没有去过分配器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号