首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AIMS Public Health >Theoretical Antecedents of Standing at Work: An Experience Sampling Approach Using the Theory of Planned Behavior
【2h】

Theoretical Antecedents of Standing at Work: An Experience Sampling Approach Using the Theory of Planned Behavior

机译:站立工作的理论前提:一种使用计划行为理论的经验抽样方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Time spent sitting has been associated with an increased risk of diabetes, cancer, obesity, and mental health impairments. However, 75% of Americans spend most of their days sitting, with work-sitting accounting for 63% of total daily sitting time. Little research examining theory-based antecedents of standing or sitting has been conducted. This lack of solid groundwork makes it difficult to design effective intervention strategies to decrease sitting behaviors. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as our theoretical lens to better understand factors related with beneficial standing behaviors already being practiced, we examined relationships between TPB constructs and time spent standing at work among “positive deviants” (those successful in behavior change). Experience sampling methodology (ESM), 4 times a day (midmorning, before lunch, afternoon, and before leaving work) for 5 consecutive workdays (Monday to Friday), was used to assess employees' standing time. TPB scales assessing attitude (α = 0.81–0.84), norms (α = 0.83), perceived behavioral control (α = 0.77), and intention (α = 0.78) were developed using recommended methods and collected once on the Friday before the ESM surveys started. ESM data are hierarchically nested, therefore we tested our hypotheses using multilevel structural equation modeling with Mplus. Hourly full-time university employees (n = 50; 70.6% female, 84.3% white, mean age = 44 (SD = 11), 88.2% in full-time staff positions) with sedentary occupation types (time at desk while working ≥6 hours/day) participated. A total of 871 daily surveys were completed. Only perceived behavioral control (β = 0.45, p < 0.05) was related with work-standing at the event-level (model fit: just fit); mediation through intention was not supported. This is the first study to examine theoretical antecedents of real-time work-standing in a naturalistic field setting among positive deviants. These relationships should be further examined, and behavioral intervention strategies should be guided by information obtained through this positive deviance approach to enhance perceived behavioral control, in addition to implementing environmental changes like installing standing desks.
机译:坐下来所花的时间与糖尿病,癌症,肥胖症和心理健康受损的风险增加有关。但是,有75%的美国人大部分时间都是在坐着,而工作休息占每天总坐着时间的63%。很少有研究检查基于理论的站立或坐姿的先例。由于缺乏扎实的基础,因此难以设计有效的干预策略来减少就座行为。使用计划行为理论(TPB)作为我们的理论视角,以更好地了解与已经实施的有益站立行为相关的因素,我们研究了TPB结构与“积极偏差”(成功改变行为的人)在工作上花费的时间之间的关系。 。连续5个工作日(星期一至星期五)每天4次(上午,午餐,下午和下班前)经验采样方法(ESM)用于评估员工的站立时间。通过推荐方法制定了评估态度(α= 0.81-0.84),规范(α= 0.83),知觉行为控制(α= 0.77)和意图(α= 0.78)的TPB量表,并在ESM调查之前的星期五收集一次开始。 ESM数据是分层嵌套的,因此我们使用Mplus的多级结构方程建模对假设进行了检验。久坐不动的职业类型(每小时工作时间≥6人)的全职大学时薪(n = 50;女性70.6%,白人84.3%,平均年龄= 44(SD = 11),全职员工职位的88.2%)小时/天)参加。总共进行了871次每日调查。只有知觉到的行为控制(β= 0.45,p <0.05)与事件级别的工作表现有关(模型拟合:恰好拟合);不支持通过意图进行调解。这是第一个研究积极偏差中自然主义领域中实时工作的理论前提的研究。这些关系应进一步检查,并且行为干预策略应以通过这种积极的偏差方法获得的信息为指导,以增强感知的行为控制,此外还需要实施诸如安装站立式办公桌等环境变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号