首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Orthopaedica >Development and validation of an automated and marker-free CT-based spatial analysis method (CTSA) for assessment of femoral hip implant migration In vitro accuracy and precision comparable to that of radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
【2h】

Development and validation of an automated and marker-free CT-based spatial analysis method (CTSA) for assessment of femoral hip implant migration In vitro accuracy and precision comparable to that of radiostereometric analysis (RSA)

机译:自动和无标记的基于CT的空间分析方法(CTSA)的开发和验证用于评估股骨髋关节植入物的迁移-体外准确性和精密度可与放射线立体分析(RSA)媲美

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and purpose — We developed a marker-free automated CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) method to detect stem-bone migration in consecutive CT datasets and assessed the accuracy and precision in vitro. Our aim was to demonstrate that in vitro accuracy and precision of CTSA is comparable to that of radiostereometric analysis (RSA).Material and methods — Stem and bone were segmented in 2 CT datasets and both were registered pairwise. The resulting rigid transformations were compared and transferred to an anatomically sound coordinate system, taking the stem as reference. This resulted in 3 translation parameters and 3 rotation parameters describing the relative amount of stem-bone displacement, and it allowed calculation of the point of maximal stem migration. Accuracy was evaluated in 39 comparisons by imposing known stem migration on a stem-bone model. Precision was estimated in 20 comparisons based on a zero-migration model, and in 5 patients without stem loosening.Results — Limits of the 95% tolerance intervals (TIs) for accuracy did not exceed 0.28 mm for translations and 0.20° for rotations (largest standard deviation of the signed error (SDSE): 0.081 mm and 0.057°). In vitro, limits of the 95% TI for precision in a clinically relevant setting (8 comparisons) were below 0.09 mm and 0.14° (largest SDSE: 0.012 mm and 0.020°). In patients, the precision was lower, but acceptable, and dependent on CT scan resolution.Interpretation — CTSA allows detection of stem-bone migration with an accuracy and precision comparable to that of RSA. It could be valuable for evaluation of subtle stem loosening in clinical practice.
机译:背景与目的—我们开发了一种无标记的基于CT的自动空间分析(CTSA)自动方法,以检测连续CT数据集中的干骨迁移,并评估了体外的准确性和精密度。我们的目的是证明CTSA的体外准确性和精密度可与放射线立体分析(RSA)媲美。材料和方法—将茎和骨分割成2个CT数据集,并成对注册。比较所得的刚性变换,并以杆为参考,将其转换为解剖学上合理的坐标系。这产生了3个平移参数和3个旋转参数,它们描述了茎骨位移的相对量,并允许计算最大茎迁移点。通过在茎骨模型上施加已知的茎迁移,在39个比较中评估了准确性。在基于零迁移模型的20个比较中,以及在5例没有茎松动的患者中,估计了精度。结果-95%的公差区间(TIs)的极限值,平移的误差不超过0.28 mm,旋转不超过0.20°(最大)符号误差的标准偏差(SDSE):0.081 mm和0.057°)。在体外,在临床相关情况下(8个比较),95%TI的精度极限低于0.09mm和0.14°(最大SDSE:0.012mm和0.020°)。在患者中,精确度较低,但是可以接受,并且取决于CT扫描分辨率。解释— CTSA可以以与RSA相当的精确度和精确度检测干骨迁移。对于在临床实践中评估细微的茎松动可能是有价值的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号