首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Comparison of Pharmaceutical Calculations Learning Outcomes Achieved Within a Traditional Lecture or Flipped Classroom Andragogy
【2h】

Comparison of Pharmaceutical Calculations Learning Outcomes Achieved Within a Traditional Lecture or Flipped Classroom Andragogy

机译:在传统的讲课或课堂教学法倒置的情况下获得的药物计算学习结果的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective. To compare learning outcomes achieved from a pharmaceutical calculations course taught in a traditional lecture (lecture model) and a flipped classroom (flipped model).>Methods. Students were randomly assigned to the lecture model and the flipped model. Course instructors, content, assessments, and instructional time for both models were equivalent. Overall group performance and pass rates on a standardized assessment (Pcalc OSCE) were compared at six weeks and at six months post-course completion.>Results. Student mean exam scores in the flipped model were higher than those in the lecture model at six weeks and six months later. Significantly more students passed the OSCE the first time in the flipped model at six weeks; however, this effect was not maintained at six months.>Conclusion. Within a 6 week course of study, use of a flipped classroom improves student pharmacy calculation skill achievement relative to a traditional lecture andragogy. Further study is needed to determine if the effect is maintained over time.
机译:>目的。比较传统讲课(课堂模型)和翻转教室(翻转模型)中教授的药物计算课程的学习成果。>方法。将学生随机分配演讲模型和翻转模型。两种模式的课程讲师,内容,评估和授课时间都是相同的。在课程结束后的第6周和第6个月,比较了标准评估(Pcalc OSCE)的总体表现和通过率。>结果。翻转模式的学生平均考试成绩高于在课程中的学生。六个星期零六个月后的讲座模型。六周后,有更多学生首次通过翻转模式获得了OSCE; >结论。。在6周的学习过程中,使用翻转的教室相对于传统的讲课杂技,可以提高学生的药房计算技能。需要进一步研究以确定效果是否会随着时间的推移而保持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号