首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Health >Safety Belt Use and the Switch to Primary Enforcement 1991–2003
【2h】

Safety Belt Use and the Switch to Primary Enforcement 1991–2003

机译:1991–2003年安全带的使用和主要执法的转变

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

State seat belt laws have increased use rates and have reduced traffic fatalities, but tremendous variation exists in the laws. New Hampshire does not have a law, and 30 states have only secondary enforcement laws. Whereas primary enforcement allows an officer to issue a citation for any infraction, secondary enforcement permits a citation only if a motorist is stopped for another infraction first.We performed a cross-sectional time-series analysis of the impact of upgrading to primary enforcement on belt use rates for 47 states and the District of Columbia from 1991 to 2003. Our results suggest that states with secondary enforcement laws could increase belt use by 10 percentage points and improve public safety considerably by upgrading to primary enforcement.
机译:州安全带法律提高了使用率,减少了交通事故,但是法律存在巨大差异。新罕布什尔州没有法律,只有30个州只有二级执法法。初级执法允许官员对任何违规行为进行引用,而二级执法仅在驾驶员首先因另一种违规行为而停车时才允许进行引用。我们对升级为初级执法对皮带的影响进行了截面时间序列分析1991年至2003年期间,有47个州和哥伦比亚特区使用率高。我们的结果表明,具有二级执法法律的州可以通过升级为一级执法,将安全带使用率提高10个百分点,并大大改善公共安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号