首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Health >Results of routine restaurant inspections can predict outbreaks of foodborne illness: the Seattle-King County experience.
【2h】

Results of routine restaurant inspections can predict outbreaks of foodborne illness: the Seattle-King County experience.

机译:餐馆常规检查的结果可以预测食源性疾病的爆发:西雅图-金县的经验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To analyze the association between the results of routine inspections and foodborne outbreaks in restaurants, we conducted a matched case-control study using available data from Seattle-King County, Washington. Case restaurants were facilities with a reported foodborne outbreak between January 1, 1986 and March 31, 1987 (N = 28). Two control restaurants with no reported outbreaks during this period were matched to each case restaurant on county health district and date of routine inspection (N = 56). Data from the routine inspection that preceded the outbreak (for case restaurants) or the date-matched routine inspection (for control restaurants) were abstracted from computerized inspection records. Case restaurants had a significantly lower mean inspection score (83.8 on a 0 to 100 point scale) than control restaurants (90.9). Restaurants with poor inspection scores and violations of proper temperature controls of potentially hazardous foods were, respectively, five and ten times more likely to have outbreaks than restaurants with better results. Although this study demonstrates that Seattle-King County's routine inspection form can successfully identify restaurants at increased risk of foodborne outbreaks, it also illustrates that more emphasis on regulation and education is needed to prevent outbreaks in restaurants with poor inspection results.
机译:为了分析常规检查结果与餐厅食源性暴发之间的关联,我们使用华盛顿州西雅图-金县的可用数据进行了匹配的病例对照研究。案例餐厅是据报道在1986年1月1日至1987年3月31日之间爆发食源性暴发的设施(N = 28)。在此期间,没有报告疫情暴发的两家对照餐馆与县卫生区的每一家餐馆和例行检查日期相匹配(N = 56)。从计算机化检查记录中提取暴发之前的例行检查数据(对于餐馆)或日期匹配的例行检查数据(对于对照餐馆)。案例餐厅的平均检查分数(0至100分制为83.8)明显低于对照餐厅(90.9)。检验得分低且违反潜在危险食品适当温度控制措施的餐馆发生暴发的可能性分别比结果更好的餐馆高五倍和十倍。尽管这项研究表明,西雅图-金县的例行检查表可以成功地识别出食源性暴发风险增加的餐馆,但它也表明,需要更多的法规和教育来防止检查结果差的餐馆暴发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号