首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Does GEM-Encoding Clinical Practice Guidelines Improve the Quality of Knowledge Bases? A Study with the Rule-Based Formalism
【2h】

Does GEM-Encoding Clinical Practice Guidelines Improve the Quality of Knowledge Bases? A Study with the Rule-Based Formalism

机译:编码GEM的临床实践指南是否可以提高知识库的质量?基于规则的形式主义研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this work was to determine whether the GEM-encoding step could improve the representation of clinical practice guidelines as formalized knowledge bases. We used the 1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension, chosen as the knowledge source in the ASTI project. We first clarified semantic ambiguities of therapeutic sequences recommended in the guideline by proposing an interpretative framework of therapeutic strategies. Then, after a formalization step to standardize the terms used to characterize clinical situations, we created the GEM-encoded instance of the guideline. We developed a module for the automatic derivation of a rule base, BR-GEM, from the instance. BR-GEM was then compared to the rule base, BR-ASTI, embedded within the critic mode of ASTI, and manually built by two physicians from the same Canadian guideline. As compared to BR-ASTI, BR-GEM is more specific and covers more clinical situations. When evaluated on 10 patient cases, the GEM-based approach led to promising results.
机译:这项工作的目的是确定GEM编码步骤是否可以改善临床实践指南作为正式知识库的表示形式。我们使用了1999年加拿大推荐的高血压管理建议,将其作为ASTI项目的知识来源。我们首先通过提出治疗策略的解释框架来阐明指南中推荐的治疗序列的语义歧义。然后,在经过正规化步骤以标准化用于表征临床情况的术语之后,我们创建了该指南的GEM编码实例。我们开发了一个用于从实例自动派生规则库BR-GEM的模块。然后将BR-GEM与规则库BR-ASTI进行比较,该规则库嵌入ASTI的批注模式中,并由来自同一加拿大指南的两名医师手动构建。与BR-ASTI相比,BR-GEM更具特异性,涵盖了更多的临床情况。当评估10例患者时,基于GEM的方法得出了可喜的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号