首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Culling a clinical terminology: a systematic approach to identifying problematic content.
【2h】

Culling a clinical terminology: a systematic approach to identifying problematic content.

机译:选出临床术语:识别问题内容的系统方法。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The College of American Pathologists and the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom are merging their respective clinical terminologies, SNOMED RT and Clinical Terms Version 3, into a new terminology, SNOMED CT. This requires mapping concept descriptions between the two existing terminologies. During the mapping process, many descriptions were identified as being potentially problematic. They require further review by the SNOMED editorial process before either (1) being incorporated into SNOMED CT, or (2) retired from active use. This article presents data on the concept descriptions that were identified as needing further review during the early phases of SNOMED CT development. Based on this work, we describe fourteen types of problematic terminology content. Identifying problematic terminology content can be approached in a systematic manner.
机译:英国的美国病理学家学院和英国国家卫生服务局(NHS)正在将各自的临床术语SNOMED RT和临床术语第3版合并到新的术语SNOMED CT中。这需要在两个现有术语之间映射概念描述。在映射过程中,许多描述被确定为潜在问题。他们需要(1)被并入SNOMED CT,或者(2)退出现役使用之前,由SNOMED编辑程序进行进一步审查。本文介绍有关概念描述的数据,这些数据在SNOMED CT开发的早期阶段被确定为需要进一步审查。基于这项工作,我们描述了有问题的术语内容的十四种类型。识别有问题的术语内容可以系统地进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号