首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Maximum likelihood training of connectionist models: comparison with least squares back-propagation and logistic regression.
【2h】

Maximum likelihood training of connectionist models: comparison with least squares back-propagation and logistic regression.

机译:连接论模型的最大似然训练:与最小二乘反向传播和逻辑回归的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents maximum likelihood back-propagation (ML-BP), an approach to training neural networks. The widely reported original approach uses least squares back-propagation (LS-BP), minimizing the sum of squared errors (SSE). Unfortunately, least squares estimation does not give a maximum likelihood (ML) estimate of the weights in the network. Logistic regression, on the other hand, gives ML estimates for single layer linear models only. This report describes how to obtain ML estimates of the weights in a multi-layer model, and compares LS-BP to ML-BP using several examples. It shows that in many neural networks, least squares estimation gives inferior results and should be abandoned in favor of maximum likelihood estimation. Questions remain about the potential uses of multi-level connectionist models in such areas as diagnostic systems and risk-stratification in outcomes research.
机译:本文提出了最大似然反向传播(ML-BP),一种训练神经网络的方法。广泛报道的原始方法使用最小二乘反向传播(LS-BP),从而将平方误差之和(SSE)最小化。不幸的是,最小二乘估计不能给出网络中权重的最大似然(ML)估计。另一方面,逻辑回归仅给出单层线性模型的ML估计值。本报告介绍了如何在多层模型中获得权重的ML估计,并使用几个示例将LS-BP与ML-BP进行了比较。它表明在许多神经网络中,最小二乘估计给出的结果均较差,应放弃使用最大似然估计。关于多层连接主义模型在诊断系统和结果研究中的风险分层等领域的潜在用途仍然存在疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号