首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ambio >‘Contractual’ and ‘cooperative’ civic engagement: The emergence and roles of ‘flood action groups’ in England and Wales
【2h】

‘Contractual’ and ‘cooperative’ civic engagement: The emergence and roles of ‘flood action groups’ in England and Wales

机译:契约式和合作式公民参与:洪水行动小组在英格兰和威尔士的出现和作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Devolution of responsibilities is transforming how flood risk is managed in many countries. Research assessing the emergence and role of a new element in the governance of flood risk management in England explored the numerous ‘flood action groups’ that have developed over the last decade. We identified two broad categories of relationship between the public and authorities. The first displays ‘contractual’ characteristics: a level of protection provided by the authority in exchange for taxes or similar support. The second embodies a ‘collaborative’ relationship: public knowledge, social and financial resources are equal and complementary to those of authority, and seeking ‘collective security’. In general, the former were more successful than the latter, but common lessons were that success in FRM should not be defined purely as the ability to prevent flooding, but as the ability to access a variety of resources across different levels of society at different stages of flood risk management.
机译:责任下放正在改变许多国家管理洪水风险的方式。一项评估新要素在英国洪水风险管理治理中的出现和作用的研究,探索了过去十年中形成的众多“洪水行动小组”。我们确定了公众与当局之间的两大类关系。第一个显示“合同”特征:当局为交换税收或类似支持而提供的保护级别。第二种体现了“合作”关系:公共知识,社会和财政资源是平等的,是对权威的补充,并寻求“集体安全”。一般而言,前者比后者更成功,但共同的教训是,FRM的成功不应纯粹定义为预防洪灾的能力,而应定义为在不同阶段访问不同社会阶层的各种资源的能力洪水风险管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号