首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Anesthesiology Research and Practice >Does the Site of Anterior Tracheal Puncture Affect the Success Rate of Retrograde Intubation? A Prospective Manikin-Based Study
【2h】

Does the Site of Anterior Tracheal Puncture Affect the Success Rate of Retrograde Intubation? A Prospective Manikin-Based Study

机译:前气管穿刺部位是否影响逆行插管成功率?基于人体模型的前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Retrograde intubation is useful for obtaining endotracheal access when direct laryngoscopy proves difficult. The technique is a practical option in the “cannot intubate / can ventilate” scenario. However, it is equally useful as an elective technique in awake patients with anticipated difficult airways. Many practitioners report difficulty successfully advancing the endotracheal tube due to anatomical obstructions and the acute angle of the anterograde guide. The purpose of this study was to test whether a more caudal tracheal puncture would increase the success rate. Methods. Twenty-four anesthesiology residents were randomly assigned to either a cricothyroid or a cricotracheal puncture group. Each was instructed how to perform the technique and then attempted it on a manikin at their assigned site. Data collection included whether the trachea was intubated, the number of attempts required, and the total time. Results. Both groups displayed a high degree of success. While the group assigned to the cricotracheal site required significantly more time to perform the procedure, they accomplished it in fewer attempts than the cricothyroid group. Conclusion. Retrograde intubation performed via a cricotracheal puncture site, while more time consuming, resulted in fewer attempts to advance the endotracheal tube and may reduce in vivo laryngeal trauma.
机译:背景。当直接喉镜检查证明困难时,逆行插管可用于获得气管内通路。在“不能插管/可以通气”的情况下,该技术是一种实用的选择。但是,它在醒来时预期有困难气道的患者中作为选择性技术同样有用。许多医生报告由于解剖学障碍和顺行引导器的锐角,很难成功地推进气管插管。这项研究的目的是测试尾气管穿刺是否会增加成功率。方法。二十四名麻醉科住院医师被随机分为环甲状腺或环气管穿刺组。每个人都被指示如何执行该技术,然后在指定地点的人体模型上尝试该技术。数据收集包括是否插入气管,需要尝试的次数以及总时间。结果。两组都显示出很高的成功率。虽然分配给环气管部位的组需要大量时间来执行该程序,但与环甲组相比,他们以更少的尝试完成了该过程。结论。通过环气管穿刺部位进行逆行气管插管虽然比较费时,但导致气管插管前进的尝试较少,并且可以减少体内喉损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号