首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Anesthesiology Research and Practice >Perioperative Nerve Blockade: Clues from the Bench
【2h】

Perioperative Nerve Blockade: Clues from the Bench

机译:围手术期神经封锁:替补席上的线索

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Peripheral and neuraxial nerve blockades are widely used in the perioperative period. Their values to diminish acute postoperative pain are established but other important outcomes such as chronic postoperative pain, or newly, cancer recurrence, or infections could also be influenced. The long-term effects of perioperative nerve blockade are still controversial. We will review current knowledge of the effects of blocking peripheral electrical activity in different animal models of pain. We will first go over the mechanisms of pain development and evaluate which types of fibers are activated after an injury. In the light of experimental results, we will propose some hypotheses explaining the mitigated results obtained in clinical studieson chronic postoperative pain. Finally, we willdiscuss three major disadvantages of the currentblockade: the absence of blockade of myelinatedfibers, the inappropriate duration of blockade,and the existence of activity-independentmechanisms.
机译:围手术期广泛使用神经周围神经阻滞。已经确立了它们减轻急性术后疼痛的价值,但其他重要结果,例如慢性术后疼痛,或新近出现的癌症复发或感染也可能受到影响。围手术期神经阻滞的长期效果仍存在争议。我们将回顾在不同的动物疼痛模型中阻断外周电活动影响的当前知识。我们将首先探讨疼痛发展的机制,并评估受伤后激活的纤维类型。根据实验结果,我们将提出一些假设,以解释在临床研究中获得的缓解结果对慢性术后疼痛。最后,我们将讨论当前的三个主要弊端封锁:无髓鞘的封锁纤维,不适当的封锁时间,以及与活动无关的存在机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号