首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animal Nutrition >Techniques for evaluating digestibility of energy amino acids phosphorus and calcium in feed ingredients for pigs
【2h】

Techniques for evaluating digestibility of energy amino acids phosphorus and calcium in feed ingredients for pigs

机译:评价猪饲料原料中能量氨基酸磷和钙的消化率的技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sound feed formulation is dependent upon precise evaluation of energy and nutrients values in feed ingredients. Hence the methodology to determine the digestibility of energy and nutrients in feedstuffs should be chosen carefully before conducting experiments. The direct and difference procedures are widely used to determine the digestibility of energy and nutrients in feedstuffs. The direct procedure is normally considered when the test feedstuff can be formulated as the sole source of the component of interest in the test diet. However, in some cases where test ingredients can only be formulated to replace a portion of the basal diet to provide the component of interest, the difference procedure can be applied to get equally robust values. Based on components of interest, ileal digesta or feces can be collected, and different sample collection processes can be used. For example, for amino acids (AA), to avoid the interference of fermentation in the hind gut, ileal digesta samples are collected to determine the ileal digestibility and simple T-cannula and index method are commonly used techniques for AA digestibility analysis. For energy, phosphorus, and calcium, normally fecal samples will be collected to determine the total tract digestibility, and therefore the total collection method is recommended to obtain more accurate estimates. Concerns with the use of apparent digestibility values include different estimated values from different inclusion level and non-additivity in mixtures of feed ingredients. These concerns can be overcome by using standardized digestibility, or true digestibility, by correcting endogenous losses of components from apparent digestibility values. In this review, methodologies used to determine energy and nutrients digestibility in pigs are discussed. It is suggested that the methodology should be carefully selected based on the component of interest, feed ingredients, and available experimental facilities.
机译:合理的饲料配方取决于对饲料原料中能量和营养成分值的精确评估。因此,在进行实验之前,应仔细选择确定饲料中能量和养分的消化率的方法。直接和差异程序被广泛用于确定饲料中能量和营养成分的消化率。当可将测试饲料配制为测试饮食中目标成分的唯一来源时,通常会考虑采用直接程序。但是,在某些情况下,仅可以配制测试成分来代替一部分基础饮食以提供所需的成分,可以应用差异程序来获得同样可靠的值。基于感兴趣的成分,可以收集回肠消化物或粪便,并且可以使用不同的样品收集过程。例如,对于氨基酸(AA),为避免发酵干扰后肠,收集回肠消化物样品以确定回肠的消化率,而简单的T型插管和索引方法是AA消化率分析的常用技术。对于能量,磷和钙,通常会收集粪便样品以确定总消化率,因此建议采用总收集方法以获得更准确的估算值。使用表观消化率值的担忧包括不同进料水平和饲料成分混合物中的非可加性得出的不同估算值。通过使用标准化的消化率或真实的消化率,可以通过从表观消化率值中校正组分的内源性损失来解决这些问题。在这篇综述中,讨论了用于确定猪的能量和养分消化率的方法。建议应根据目标组分,饲料成分和可用的实验设备仔细选择方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号