首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >Valence and Intensity of Video Stimuli of Dogs and Conspecifics in Sheep: Approach-Avoidance Operant Response and Attention
【2h】

Valence and Intensity of Video Stimuli of Dogs and Conspecifics in Sheep: Approach-Avoidance Operant Response and Attention

机译:绵羊的犬和犬种的视频刺激物的价和强度:避免进近操作性反应和注意力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Simple SummaryAnimals’ judgement of stimuli’s negativity or positivity cannot always be assumed. To assess the valence and intensity of video stimuli (dogs as negative vs. conspecifics as positive stimuli) in sheep, we used three experimental approaches: (1) an approach-avoidance paradigm; (2) operant conditioning using the videos as reinforcers; and (3) an attention test. We measured sheep’s behavioral and physiological reactions. Sheep generally reacted to the videos presented. Nevertheless, we found no support with the approach–avoidance paradigm, and the attention test for dog videos were more negative than sheep videos. However, the operant conditioning indicated that sheep were more prone to avoid videos of moving dogs. Overall, we found that standard video images may not be ideal to represent valence characteristics of stimuli to sheep.
机译:简单总结不能总是假设动物对刺激物的阴性或阳性的判断。为了评估绵羊视频刺激的效价和强度(狗为阴性刺激,同种犬为阳性刺激),我们使用了三种实验方法:(1)一种避免接触的范例; (2)使用视频作为强化的操作条件; (3)注意力测试。我们测量了绵羊的行为和生理反应。绵羊通常会对所展示的视频做出反应。然而,我们发现这种方法-避免范式没有得到支持,并且狗视频的注意力测试比绵羊视频的负面测试更为负面。然而,手术条件表明,绵羊更倾向于避免移动狗的录像。总体而言,我们发现标准视频图像可能并不理想,无法代表绵羊刺激的化合价特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号