首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials >Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?
【2h】

Should we use closed or open infusion containers for prevention of bloodstream infections?

机译:我们应该使用封闭或开放的输液容器来预防血液感染吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundHospitalized patients in critical care settings are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSI). Most BSIs originate from a central line (CL), and they increase length of stay, cost, and mortality. Open infusion containers may increase the risk of contamination and administration-related (CLAB) because they allow the entry of air into the system, thereby also providing an opportunity for microbial entry. Closed infusion containers were designed to overcome this flaw. However, open infusion containers are still widely used throughout the world.The objective of the study was to determine the effect of switching from open (glass, burettes, and semi-rigid) infusion containers to closed, fully collapsible, plastic infusion containers (Viaflex®) on the rate and time to onset of central line-associated bloodstream infections CLABs.
机译:背景重症监护病房的住院患者存在血液感染(BSI)的风险。大多数BSI源自中心线(CL),它们会增加住院时间,成本和死亡率。开放的输液容器可能增加污染和与给药有关的风险(CLAB),因为它们允许空气进入系统,从而也为微生物进入提供了机会。设计封闭的输液容器可克服此缺陷。然而,开放式输液器仍在世界范围内广泛使用。研究的目的是确定从开放式(玻璃,滴定管和半刚性)输注器切换为完全可折叠的密闭塑料输注器(Viaflex ®)来确定中心线相关的血液感染CLABs发生的速度和时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号