首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Lack of Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on the Physician-Patient Encounter in Primary Care: A SNOCAP Report
【2h】

Lack of Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on the Physician-Patient Encounter in Primary Care: A SNOCAP Report

机译:SNOCAP报告缺少直接面向消费者的广告对基层医疗中医师-患者遭遇的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) has increased tremendously during the past decade. Recent changes in the DTCA environment may have affected its impact on clinical encounters. Our objective was to determine the rate of patient medication inquiries and their influence on clinical encounters in primary care.>METHODS Our methods consisted of a cross-sectional survey in the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners, a collaboration of 3 practice-based research networks. Clinicians completed a short patient encounter form after consecutive patient encounter for one-half or 1 full day. The main outcomes were the rate of inquiries, independent predictors of inquiries, and overall impact on clinical encounters.>RESULTS One hundred sixty-eight clinicians in 22 practices completed forms after 1,647 patient encounters. In 58 encounters (3.5%), the patient inquired about a specific new prescription medication. Community health center patients made fewer inquiries than private practice patients (1.7% vs 7.2%, P<.001). Predictors of inquiries included taking 3 or more chronic medications and the clinician being female. Most clinicians reported the requested medication was not their first choice for treatment (62%), but it was prescribed in 53% of the cases. Physicians interpreted the overall impact on the visit as positive in 24% of visits, neutral in 66%, and negative in 10%.>CONCLUSIONS Patient requests for prescription medication were uncommon overall, and even more so among patients in lower income groups. These requests were rarely perceived by clinicians as having a negative impact on the encounter. Future mixed methods studies should explore specific socioeconomic groups and reasons for clinicians’ willingness to prescribe these medications.
机译:>目的在过去十年中,针对消费者的广告(DTCA)有了巨大的增长。 DTCA环境的最新变化可能已经影响了它对临床遭遇的影响。我们的目标是确定患者用药咨询的比率及其对基层医疗中临床遭遇的影响。>方法我们的方法包括在科罗拉多州门诊实践和合作伙伴国家网络中进行的一项横断面调查。 3个基于实践的研究网络的协作。在连续两次或半天的患者连续遭遇病人后,临床医生填写了一个简短的患者遭遇表格。主要结果是询问率,询问的独立预测因子以及对临床遭遇的总体影响。>结果。22个实践中的168位临床医生在遇到1647例患者后完成了表格。在58次遭遇(3.5%)中,患者询问了特定的新处方药。社区卫生中心患者的问诊次数少于私人执业患者(1.7%对7.2%,P <.001)。调查的预测因素包括服用3种或以上慢性药物,且临床医生为女性。大多数临床医生报告说,要求的药物不是他们的首选治疗方法(62%),但有53%的患者开了处方药。医师将对访视的总体影响解释为:访视的积极影响为24%,中性为66%,负面为10%。>结论患者对处方药的需求并不普遍,在患者中更为普遍在低收入人群中。临床医生很少将这些要求视为对相遇产生负面影响。未来的混合方法研究应探讨特定的社会经济群体以及临床医生愿意开这些药物的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号