首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England >The place of antibiotics in preventing wound infection after clean operations in an Indian hospital: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial.
【2h】

The place of antibiotics in preventing wound infection after clean operations in an Indian hospital: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial.

机译:印度医院清洁手术后抗生素在预防伤口感染中的作用:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two hundred patients in a major Indian hospital who were undergoing clean operations participated in a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial of the effectiveness of systemic antibiotics in preventing wound infectious. Of the patients on antibiotics 12.6% developed wound infections and of those not on antibiotics 13.3% did--a difference of no significance. Other factors analysed which included age, duration of operation, place on the operating list and length of the incision did not appear to effect the incidence of infection. Wound infection delayed the discharge of the patient from hospital by seven days. Avoiding antibiotic prophylaxis in these operations would have saved our hospital 12,500 pounds a year. We suggest that prophylactic antibiotics are ineffective in preventing wound infection after clean operations in India. Their use is wasteful and should be discouraged.
机译:印度一家大型医院的200名正在接受清洁手术的患者参加了一项前瞻性,随机对照临床试验,研究了系统抗生素预防伤口感染的有效性。使用抗生素的患者中有12.6%发生了伤口感染,而未使用抗生素的患者中有13.3%发生了伤口感染-差异无显着性。分析的其他因素包括年龄,手术时间,在手术单上的位置以及切口的长度似乎都没有影响感染的发生。伤口感染将患者出院推迟了7天。在这些手术中避免抗生素的预防将为我们的医院每年节省12500磅。我们建议在印度进行清洁手术后,预防性抗生素对预防伤口感染无效。使用它们是浪费的,不建议使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号