首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Surgery >Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma.
【2h】

Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma.

机译:肠内和肠胃外喂养。对钝性和穿透性腹部创伤后败血症发病率的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To investigate the importance of route of nutrient administration on septic complications after blunt and penetrating trauma, 98 patients with an abdominal trauma index of at least 15 were randomized to either enteral or parenteral feeding within 24 hours of injury. Septic morbidity was defined as pneumonia, intra-abdominal abscess, empyema, line sepsis, or fasciitis with wound dehiscence. Patients were fed formulas with almost identical amounts of fat, carbohydrate, and protein. Two patients died early in the study. The enteral group sustained significantly fewer pneumonias (11.8% versus total parenteral nutrition 31.%, p less than 0.02), intra-abdominal abscess (1.9% versus total parenteral nutrition 13.3%, p less than 0.04), and line sepsis (1.9% versus total parenteral nutrition 13.3%, p less than 0.04), and sustained significantly fewer infections per patient (p less than 0.03), as well as significantly fewer infections per infected patient (p less than 0.05). Although there were no differences in infection rates in patients with injury severity score less than 20 or abdominal trauma index less than or equal to 24, there were significantly fewer infections in patients with an injury severity score greater than 20 (p less than 0.002) and abdominal trauma index greater than 24 (p less than 0.005). Enteral feeding produced significantly fewer infections in the penetrating group (p less than 0.05) and barely missed the statistical significance in the blunt-injured patients (p = 0.08). In the subpopulation of patients requiring more than 20 units of blood, sustaining an abdominal trauma index greater than 40 or requiring reoperation within 72 hours, there were significantly fewer infections per patient (p = 0.03) and significantly fewer infections per infected patient (p less than 0.01). There is a significantly lower incidence of septic morbidity in patients fed enterally after blunt and penetrating trauma, with most of the significant changes occurring in the more severely injured patients. The authors recommend that the surgeon obtain enteral access at the time of initial celiotomy to assure an opportunity for enteral delivery of nutrients, particularly in the most severely injured patients.
机译:为了研究营养施用途径对钝性和穿透性创伤后败血症并发症的重要性,将98名腹部创伤指数至少为15的患者在受伤后24小时内随机分为肠内或肠胃外喂养。败血症的发病率定义为肺炎,腹腔内脓肿,脓胸,败血症或伴有裂开的筋膜炎。用几乎相同量的脂肪,碳水化合物和蛋白质喂给患者的配方奶。两名患者在研究早期死亡。肠内感染的肺炎患者显着减少(分别为11.8%和胃肠外营养的31。%,p小于0.02),腹腔脓肿(1.9%和肠胃外营养的13.3%,p小于0.04)和败血症(1.9%)与总肠胃外营养的比率为13.3%,p小于0.04),并且每位患者感染的持续感染显着减少(p小于0.03),每位感染患者的感染显着减少(p小于0.05)。尽管伤害严重度评分小于20或腹部创伤指数小于或等于24的患者的感染率没有差异,但伤害严重度评分大于20的患者(p小于0.002)的感染率显着降低,且腹部创伤指数大于24(p小于0.005)。在穿透组中,肠内喂养产生的感染明显更少(p小于0.05),而在钝伤患者中几乎没有错过统计学意义(p = 0.08)。在需要超过20单位血液,维持腹部创伤指数大于40或需要在72小时内再次手术的患者人群中,每位患者的感染明显减少(p = 0.03),每位感染患者的感染明显减少(p减少大于0.01)。在钝器和穿透性创伤后经肠喂养的患者中,败血病的发生率显着降低,其中大多数重大变化发生在受伤更严重的患者中。作者建议外科医生在初次开胸手术时应获得肠内通路,以确保有机会向肠内输送营养,特别是在受重伤最严重的患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号