首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Surgery >Terrorist bombings. Lessons learned from Belfast to Beirut.
【2h】

Terrorist bombings. Lessons learned from Belfast to Beirut.

机译:恐怖爆炸。从贝尔法斯特到贝鲁特的经验教训。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Experience in the management of mass casualties following a disaster is relatively sparse. The terrorist bombing serves as a timely and effective model for the analysis of patterns of injury and mortality and the determination of the factors influencing casualty survival in the wake of certain forms of disaster. For this purpose, a review of the published experience with terrorist bombings was carried out, providing a study population of 3357 casualties from 220 incidents worldwide. There were 2934 immediate survivors of these incidents (87%), of whom 881 (30%) were hospitalized. Forty deaths ultimately occurred among these survivors (1.4%), 39 of whom were among those hospitalized (4.4%). Injury severity was determined from available data for 1339 surviving casualties, 251 of whom were critically injured (18.7%). Of this population evaluable for injury severity, there were 31 late deaths, all of which occurred among those critically injured, accounting for an overall "critical mortality" rate of 12.4%. Overall triage efficiency was characterized by a mean overtriage rate (noncritically injured among those hospitalized or evacuated) of 59%, and a mean undertriage rate (critically injured among those not hospitalized or evacuated) of .05%. Multiple linear regression analysis of all major bombing incidents demonstrated a direct linear relationship between overtriage and critical mortality (r2 = .845), and an inversely proportional relationship between triage discrimination and critical mortality (r2 = 0.855). Although head injuries predominated in both immediate (71%) and late (52%) fatalities, injury to the abdomen carried the highest specific mortality rate (19%) of any single body system injury among immediate survivors. These data clearly document the importance of accurate triage as a survival determinant for critically injured casualties of these disasters. Furthermore, the data suggest that explosive force, time interval from injury to treatment, and anatomic site of injury are all factors that correlated with the ultimate outcome of terrorist bombing victims. Critical analysis of past disasters should allow for sufficient preparation so as to minimize casualty mortality in the future.
机译:在灾难发生后处理大规模人员伤亡的经验相对较少。恐怖主义爆炸是及时有效的模型,可用于分析伤害和死亡的方式以及确定在某些形式的灾难后影响伤亡人员生存的因素。为此,对已发表的有关恐怖主义爆炸的经验进行了回顾,对来自全球220次事件的3357人伤亡进行了研究。这些事件的直接幸存者有2934人(87%),其中881人(30%)住院了。这些幸存者中最终有40例死亡(占1.4%),其中39例住院(4.4%)。从现有的1339名死伤人员的数据中确定了受伤的严重程度,其中251人受了重伤(占18.7%)。在可评估伤害严重性的这一人群中,有31例晚期死亡,所有这些死亡均发生在严重受伤的人群中,占总体“严重死亡率”的12.4%。总体分流效率的特征是平均过分流失率(在住院或撤离的患者中不严重受伤)为59%,平均未分流率(在未住院或撤离的患者中为严重受伤)为0.05%。所有主要轰炸事件的多元线性回归分析表明,超额分流与临界死亡率之间存在直接线性关系(r2 = .845),而分流判别与临界死亡率之间存在反比例关系(r2 = 0.855)。尽管头部受伤在立即死亡人数(71%)和晚期死亡人数(52%)中均占主导地位,但在直接幸存者中,腹部受伤的单身系统死亡率最高(19%)。这些数据清楚地证明了准确分类的重要性,这些分类对于这些灾难的重伤人员来说是一个生存决定因素。此外,数据表明爆炸力,从伤害到治疗的时间间隔以及伤害的解剖部位都是与恐怖分子炸弹爆炸受害者的最终结果相关的因素。对过去灾难的批判分析应允许进行充分的准备,以最大程度地减少未来的人员伤亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号