首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Surgery >Prophylactic platelet administration during massive transfusion. A prospective randomized double-blind clinical study.
【2h】

Prophylactic platelet administration during massive transfusion. A prospective randomized double-blind clinical study.

机译:大量输血期间预防性给予血小板。前瞻性随机双盲临床研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Prior studies at Harborview Medical Center have suggested that dilutional thrombocytopenia is a major etiology of microvascular, nonmechanical bleeding (MVB). We undertook a prospective randomized double-blind clinical study to compare the prophylactic effects of 6 units of platelet concentrates (PLT) versus 2 units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) administered with every 12 units of modified whole blood in patients undergoing massive transfusion (12 or more units in 12 hours). After exclusions, three of 17 patients who received PLT and three of 16 patients who received FFP developed MVB, an incidence no different from our previous findings. Regression lines of platelet counts during transfusion were no different between groups, and both groups had higher platelet counts than predicted from a standard washout equation. Only one patient had evidence of dilutional thrombocytopenia as a cause for MVB. Prophylactic platelet administration is not warranted as a routine measure to prevent MVB.
机译:Harborview医学中心的先前研究表明,稀释性血小板减少症是微血管,非机械性出血(MVB)的主要病因。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机双盲临床研究,以比较每6单位血小板浓缩液(PLT)与2单位新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)以及每12单位改良全血给药对大输血患者的预防作用(12或在12小时内获得更多单位)。排除后,接受PLT的17例患者中的3例和接受FFP的16例患者中的3例发生了MVB,其发生率与我们先前的发现无异。输血期间血小板计数的回归线在各组之间无差异,并且两组的血小板计数均高于标准洗脱方程所预测的数值。只有一名患者有证据表明稀释性血小板减少是MVB的原因。预防性给予血小板不能作为预防MVB的常规措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号