首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine / Annual Scientific Conference >Effect of Booster Seat Design on Children’s Choice of Seating Positions During Naturalistic Riding
【2h】

Effect of Booster Seat Design on Children’s Choice of Seating Positions During Naturalistic Riding

机译:增高座椅设计对儿童自然骑行中坐姿选择的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this naturalistic study was to investigate the effect of booster seat design on the choice of children’s seating positions during naturalistic riding. Data was collected through observations of children during in-vehicle riding by means of a film camera. The children were positioned in high back boosters in the rear seat while a parent drove the car. The study included two different booster designs: one with large head and torso side supports, and one with small head side supports and no torso side supports. Six children between three and six years of age participated in the study. Each child was observed in both boosters. The duration of the seating positions that each child assumed was quantified. The design with large side head supports resulted more often in seating positions without head and shoulder contact with the booster’s back. There was shoulder-to-booster back contact during an average of 45% of riding time in the seat with the large head side supports compared to 75% in the seat with the small head supports. The children in the study were seated with the head in front of the front edge of the head side supports more than half the time, in both boosters. Laterally, the children were almost constantly positioned between the side supports of the booster in both seats. The observed seating positions probably reduce the desired protective effect by the side supports in side impact, and may increase the probability of head impact with the vehicle interior in frontal impact.
机译:这项自然主义研究的目的是调查自然主义骑行过程中增高座椅设计对儿童座椅位置选择的影响。借助胶卷相机在乘车过程中对儿童进行观察来收集数据。当父母开车时,孩子们被安置在后座的高背助推器上。这项研究包括两种不同的助推器设计:一种具有较大的头部和躯干侧部支撑,另一种具有较小的头部侧部支撑而没有躯干侧部支撑。六名三至六岁的儿童参加了这项研究。两个助推器中均观察到每个孩子。量化每个孩子担任的就座位置的持续时间。具有大侧部头部支撑的设计使坐姿更加频繁,而头部和肩膀不会与助推器的背部接触。大头侧支撑的座椅在平均骑行时间的45%期间出现了肩对背的背接触,而小头侧支撑的座椅在骑车的平均时间为75%。在两个助推器中,研究中的儿童都坐着,头部的头部位于头侧支撑的前边缘的前面,超过一半的时间。在侧面,两个座位上的孩子几乎总是固定在助推器的侧支撑之间。观察到的座椅位置可能会降低侧面碰撞时侧支撑的所需保护作用,并且可能增加正面碰撞时车辆内部发生头部碰撞的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号