首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Translational Medicine >Nebulized anticoagulants in lung injury in critically ill patients—an updated systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies
【2h】

Nebulized anticoagulants in lung injury in critically ill patients—an updated systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

机译:雾化抗凝剂在重症患者肺损伤中的作用-临床前和临床研究的最新系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pneumonia, inhalation trauma and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), typical causes of lung injury in critically ill patients, are all three characterized by dysregulated inflammation and coagulation in the lungs. Nebulized anticoagulants are thought to have beneficial effects as they could attenuate pulmonary coagulopathy and maybe even affect pulmonary inflammation. A systematic search of the medical literature was performed using terms referring to aspects of the condition (‘pneumonia’, ‘inhalation trauma’ and ‘ARDS’), the intervention (‘nebulized’, ‘vaporized’, and ‘aerosolized’) and anticoagulants limited to agents that are commercially available and frequently given or tested in critically ill patients [‘heparin’, ‘danaparoid’, ‘activated protein C’ (APC), ‘antithrombin’ (AT) and ‘tissue factor pathway inhibitor’ (TFPI)]. The systematic search identified 16 articles reporting on preclinical studies and 11 articles reporting on human trials. All nebulized anticoagulants attenuate pulmonary coagulopathy in preclinical studies using various models for lung injury, but the effects on inflammation are less consistent. Nebulized heparin, danaparoid and TFPI, but not APC and AT also reduced systemic coagulation. Nebulized heparin in lung injury patients shows contradictory results, and there is concern over systemic side effects of this strategy. Future studies need to focus on the way to nebulize anticoagulants, as well as on efficient but safe dosages, and other side effects.
机译:肺炎,吸入性创伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是重症患者肺损伤的典型原因,这三个特征都是肺部炎症和凝血失调。雾化抗凝剂被认为具有有益作用,因为它们可以减轻肺部凝血病,甚至可能影响肺部炎症。使用涉及疾病(“肺炎”,“吸入创伤”和“ ARDS”),干预措施(“雾化”,“汽化”和“雾化”)和抗凝剂方面的术语对医学文献进行系统搜索限于市售药物,并在重症患者中经常使用或测试的药物[“肝素”,“丹那普罗德”,“活化蛋白C”(APC),“抗凝血酶”(AT)和“组织因子途径抑制剂”(TFPI) ]。系统搜索确定了16篇报道临床前研究的文章和11篇报道人体试验的文章。在临床前研究中,使用各种肺损伤模型,所有雾化的抗凝剂均能减轻肺部凝血病,但对炎症的影响不太一致。雾化的肝素,danaparoid和TFPI,但APC和AT却不减少全身凝血。肺损伤患者的雾化肝素显示出矛盾的结果,并且对该策略的全身性副作用存在担忧。未来的研究需要专注于雾化抗凝剂的方式,以及有效但安全的剂量以及其他副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号