首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Translational Medicine >AB036. Comparison of the effectiveness of gefitinib erlotinib and afatinib in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated tumors of non-small cell lung cancer
【2h】

AB036. Comparison of the effectiveness of gefitinib erlotinib and afatinib in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated tumors of non-small cell lung cancer

机译:AB036。吉非替尼厄洛替尼和阿法替尼在非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体突变的肿瘤中的疗效比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts approximately 85% of lung cancers and includes predominantly adenocarcinomas, which is the most common type and squamous cell carcinomas. The treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy and the decision depends on the patient’s medical status and stage of disease. From 1970 the standard first line treatment for most patients with unresectable NSCLC and good performance status was the use of a combination of chemotherapy regimens and usually cisplatin-based. The most common combination regimens in use at present are platinum based regimens with gemcitabine, with paclitaxel or docetaxel and with vinorelbine combinations. The addition of the recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody bevacizumab that binds to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to carboplatin and paclitaxel for the treatment of non-squamous advanced NSCLC has demonstrated to increase response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared to chemotherapy alone. Despite recent advances with approval of more active chemotherapeutic and anti-angiogenesis agents for stage IV NSCLC, standard therapy can provide only modest clinical benefits with significant toxicities when used in unselected patients. In 2004, the identification of somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene provided the first glimpse of a possible target for a treatment which could maximize clinical outcome in those patients who could benefit from a personalized therapy. Identifying mutations in oncogenes associated with non-squamous NSCLC can help determine which patients are more likely to benefit from a targeted therapy. Such oncogenes include EGFR, KRAS, and ALK. The presence of an EGFR mutation confers a more favorable prognosis and strongly predicts for sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib. The use of EGFR TKIs is based upon the detection of these mutations. The incidence of EGFR mutations in tumors with non-small-cell histology ranges from ~15% in Caucasians to ~50% in East Asians; 95% of such mutations have been found in adenocarcinomas. Patients bearing EGFR mutations have shown favorable clinical outcomes even with conventional chemotherapy suggesting that EGFR may be a predictive and a prognostic factor. Activation of the EGFR protein stimulates protein tyrosine kinase, which leads to activation of signaling pathways associated with cell growth and survival. Both EGFR overexpression and activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR gene lead to tumor growth and progression. Erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib are examples of EGFR TKIs that can prevent activation of the signaling pathways and improve RRs in selected NSCLC patients. These mutations which are associated with increased sensitivity to EGFR TKIs, predominate in never-smokers, females, and tumors with adenocarcinoma histology. The most common mutations associated with sensitivity to EGFR TKIs include exon 19 deletions and the L858R point mutation and they are associated with RRs of >70%. Other EGFR mutations like T790M and exon 20 insertion, have been associated with much lower response or acquired resistance to TKI’s. The predictive value of EGFR mutations for use of gefitinib has been strengthened by the results of three randomized phase III trials that specifically compared TKIs used as first-line therapy with traditional platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. In 2009 the results of IRESSA Pan-Asia Study were presented. This trial included a big number of Asian ethnicity patients (1,217) who were never smokers or former light smokers with histologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. The trial demonstrated an improvement in PFS and RR, with no statistical difference in OS, with the use of gefitinib in EGFR-mutated tumors and better RR and PFS with standard chemotherapy in patients without mutations. The first phase III trial of gefitinib versus chemotherapy as initial treatment of recurrent or advanced NSCLC, based on selection of patients with known activating EGFR mutations was the WJTOG3405 trial, reported in 2010. This trial documented important achievements in RR and PFS with the use of TKIs. Almost the same results were confirmed by another similar Japanese phase III trial, NEJ002, with RR and PFS definitely favoring the use of gefitinib in the first-line setting of metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Based on the results of the IPASS study, gefitinib was approved for use in Europe for the initial treatment of patients with NSCLC exhibiting EGFR mutations. The positive results of the EURTAC trial, , which was a randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy, suggested that responsiveness in mutation-positive patients was not a function of ethnicity. Afatinib is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of EGFR TKI—naïve adults with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations in the EU, and for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations as detected by a US FDA-approved test in the US. In two randomized, open-label, multinational phase III trials, progression-free survival was significantly prolonged with afatinib compared with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (LUX-Lung 3) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (LUX-Lung 6) in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. EGFR-TKIs as a class are generally well tolerated. The two most common toxicities include dermatologic and GI effects, which are mild to moderate, easily managed and reversible. In order to determine whether an EGFR TKI or chemotherapy is the appropriate first-line therapy, the latest guidelines recommend mutation testing for all patients with advanced NSCLC tumor. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the efficacy of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring activating EGFR mutations in first line of treatment. These agents are recommended as first line treatments for NSCLCs with such mutations. The primary endpoint will be the PFS and the secondaries will be the OS and the record of the toxicities. In each of the 3 arms will be participate 20 patients with EGFR mutated tumors. The technique for screening NSCLC patients for driver mutations that it will be used is next-generation sequencing, which overcomes many of the shortcomings of direct sequencing. This massively parallel approach, relying heavily on automation, data storage, and computational processing, allows quantitative analysis of infrequent alleles and simultaneous evaluation of multiple genes or even whole genomes, but is not yet used routinely in clinical practice. In addition, KRAS mutation analysis will be performed in patients with known smoking history in order to determine the correlation of type and mutation frequency with smoking.
机译:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)约占肺癌的85%,主要包括腺癌,这是最常见的类型,是鳞状细胞癌。治疗方法包括手术,放射疗法和化学疗法,具体决定取决于患者的医疗状况和疾病阶段。从1970年开始,对于大多数不可切除的NSCLC且表现良好的患者,标准的一线治疗是联合使用化疗方案和通常以顺铂为基础的方案。目前使用的最常见的联合治疗方案是吉西他滨,紫杉醇或多西他赛以及长春瑞滨联合治疗的铂类治疗方案。向血管铂和紫杉醇中添加与血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)结合的重组人源化单克隆抗体贝伐单抗用于非鳞状晚期NSCLC的治疗已证明可提高应答率(RR),无进展生存期(PFS)和总体与单纯化疗相比生存率(OS)。尽管批准了用于IV期NSCLC的更具活性的化学治疗药和抗血管生成药,最近取得了一些进展,但标准疗法在未选择的患者中使用时,只能提供适度的临床益处,并且具有明显的毒性。 2004年,对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因中体细胞突变的鉴定为该疗法的可能目标提供了第一印象,该疗法可以使那些受益于个性化治疗的患者的临床疗效最大化。鉴定与非鳞状非小细胞肺癌相关的致癌基因突变可以帮助确定哪些患者更可能受益于靶向治疗。这样的癌基因包括EGFR,KRAS和ALK。 EGFR突变的存在可提供更有利的预后,并强烈预测对EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)(如厄洛替尼,吉非替尼和阿法替尼)的敏感性。 EGFR TKI的使用基于这些突变的检测。在具有非小细胞组织学的肿瘤中,EGFR突变的发生率在白种人中约15%,在东亚人中约50%。在腺癌中发现了95%的此类突变。即使采用常规化学疗法,携带EGFR突变的患者也显示出良好的临床预后,提示EGFR可能是预测和预后的因素。 EGFR蛋白的激活会刺激酪氨酸蛋白激酶,从而激活与细胞生长和存活相关的信号通路。 EGFR基因酪氨酸激酶结构域中的EGFR过表达和激活突变均导致肿瘤生长和进展。厄洛替尼,吉非替尼和阿法替尼是EGFR TKIs的实例,可在选定的NSCLC患者中阻止信号通路的激活并改善RR。这些突变与对EGFR TKIs的敏感性增加有关,在从未吸烟者,女性和腺癌组织学肿瘤中占主导地位。与对EGFR TKIs敏感性相关的最常见突变包括外显子19缺失和L858R点突变,它们与RR的> 70%相关。其他EGFR突变(例如T790M和第20外显子插入)与低得多的反应或对TKI的获得性耐药有关。 EGFR突变对于使用吉非替尼的预测价值已通过三项随机III期临床试验的结果得到了加强,这些试验专门比较了TKI作为一线治疗与传统铂类化疗用于晚期NSCLC患者的比较。 2009年,IRESSA泛亚洲研究的结果发表了。该试验包括了许多从未吸烟或曾经轻度吸烟且具有腺癌组织学诊断的亚洲种族患者(1,217)。该试验证明吉非替尼可用于EGFR突变的肿瘤中,PFS和RR均有改善,而OS没有统计学差异,而无突变的标准化疗中使用吉非替尼可改善RR和PFS。吉非替尼与化学疗法作为复发或晚期NSCLC初始治疗的第三个III期试验是基于对已知激活的EGFR突变患者的选择,该试验于2010年报道。WJTOG3405试验。该试验记录了RR和PFS在RR和PFS方面的重要成就。 TKI。另一项类似的日本III期临床试验NEJ002证实了几乎相同的结果,其中RR和PFS绝对支持在转移性EGFR突变的NSCLC一线治疗中使用吉非替尼。根据IPASS研究的结果,吉非替尼已获准在欧洲用于具有EGFR突变的NSCLC患者的初始治疗。 EURTAC试验的阳性结果,这是厄洛替尼与标准化疗相比的一项随机III期试验,表明突变阳性患者的反应能力与种族无关。阿法替尼已被批准用于治疗EGFR TKI的单一疗法,即在欧盟中患有局部晚期或转移性NSCLC且具有激活性EGFR突变的幼稚成人,以及一线治疗肿瘤EGFR外显子19缺失或外显子21的转移性NSCLC患者的一线治疗。 (L858R)替代突变,由美国FDA批准的测试在美国检测到。在两项随机,开放标签的多国III期临床试验中,未经治疗的未经治疗的晚期患者,与培美曲塞加顺铂(LUX-Lung 3)或吉西他滨加顺铂(LUX-Lung 6)相比,阿法替尼显着延长了无进展生存期。具有激活EGFR突变的NSCLC。 EGFR-TKIs一类通常耐受性良好。两种最常见的毒性包括皮肤病和胃肠道疾病,轻度至中度,易于控制和可逆。为了确定EGFR TKI或化学疗法是合适的一线治疗方法,最新指南建议对所有晚期NSCLC肿瘤患者进行突变检测。这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较吉非替尼,厄洛替尼和阿法替尼在一线治疗中晚期具有激活的EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效。推荐将这些药物作为具有此类突变的NSCLC的一线治疗药物。主要终点将是PFS,次要终点将是OS和毒性记录。在这3个小组的每个小组中,将有20名患有EGFR突变肿瘤的患者参加。下一代测序技术将用于筛查非小细胞肺癌患者的驱动程序突变,该技术克服了直接测序的许多缺点。这种高度并行的方法主要依赖于自动化,数据存储和计算处理,可以对偶发等位基因进行定量分析,并可以同时评估多个基因甚至整个基因组,但在临床实践中尚未常规使用。此外,将对已知吸烟史的患者进行KRAS突变分析,以确定类型和突变频率与吸烟的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号