首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing ceftazidime plus co-trimoxazole with chloramphenicol plus doxycycline and co-trimoxazole for treatment of severe melioidosis.
【2h】

Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing ceftazidime plus co-trimoxazole with chloramphenicol plus doxycycline and co-trimoxazole for treatment of severe melioidosis.

机译:一项多中心前瞻性随机试验比较了头孢他啶+复方新诺明与氯霉素+强力霉素和复方新诺明在治疗严重的腮腺炎中的作用。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A prospective randomized trial was conducted at Srinagarind and Khon Kaen hospitals. Ceftazidime (100 mg/kg of body weight per day) and co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim, 8 mg/kg/day; sulfamethoxazole, 40 mg/kg/day) therapy was compared with conventional therapy (chloramphenicol, 100 mg/kg/day; doxycycline, 4 mg/kg/day; trimethoprim, 8 mg/kg/day; sulfamethoxazole, 40 mg/kg/day) in the treatment of 64 patients with bacteriologically confirmed cases of severe melioidosis who were admitted during September 1986 to January 1989. Of 61 evaluable patients (3 were excluded because of severe drug allergies), 42 were septicemic, and 31 of these patients had the most severe form, disseminated septicemic melioidosis. Their cumulative mortalities on day 7 were compared. There were significantly lower overall mortalities from melioidosis, septicemic melioidosis, and disseminated septicemic melioidosis in the group receiving the new treatment compared with those in the group receiving the conventional treatment (47 versus 18.5% [P = 0.039], 57.7 versus 25% [P = 0.039], and 82.3 versus 30.7% [P = 0.006], respectively); but the differences could have been influenced by the greater severity of illness, e.g., shock at initial presentation, in the patients who received the conventional treatment. Among patients with disseminated septicemia and initial shock, there was no significant difference in mortality between the regimens. Both regimens effectively eradicated bacteria from the circulation within 24 h (97 versus 96%, respectively). We recommend ceftazidime and co-trimoxazole as the drugs of choice for treatment of severe melioidosis, especially in those patients with disseminated septicemia.
机译:在Srinagarind和Khon Kaen医院进行了一项前瞻性随机试验。将头孢他啶(每天100 mg / kg体重)和复方新诺明(甲氧苄氨嘧啶,8 mg / kg /天;磺胺甲恶唑,40 mg / kg /天)与常规疗法(氯霉素,100 mg / kg /天)进行比较;多西环素4 mg / kg /天;甲氧苄啶8 mg / kg /天;磺胺甲恶唑40 mg / kg /天)用于治疗1986年9月至1989年1月入院经细菌学证实的严重me突病患者在61例可评估的患者中(由于严重的药物过敏而排除了3例),其中42例是败血病,其中31例是最严重的形式,即弥散性的败血症型乳突病。比较了他们在第7天的累计死亡率。与常规治疗组相比,接受新治疗的组中类li虫病,败血性类li虫病和弥散性败血性类li虫病的总死亡率显着降低(47比18.5%[P = 0.039],57.7比25%[P = 0.039],分别为82.3和30.7%[P = 0.006]);但是在接受常规治疗的患者中,疾病的严重程度(例如初诊时的休克)可能会影响差异。在传播性败血病和初次休克的患者中,两种方案的死亡率没有显着差异。两种方案均能在24小时内有效地消除循环中的细菌(分别为97%对96%)。我们推荐将头孢他啶和复方新诺明作为治疗严重类痔病的首选药物,特别是对于那些败血症患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号