首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Prospective randomized evaluation of ciprofloxacin versus piperacillin plus amikacin for empiric antibiotic therapy of febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients with lymphomas and solid tumors. The European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group.
【2h】

Prospective randomized evaluation of ciprofloxacin versus piperacillin plus amikacin for empiric antibiotic therapy of febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients with lymphomas and solid tumors. The European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group.

机译:环丙沙星和哌拉西林加丁胺卡那霉素对发热性粒细胞减少癌伴淋巴瘤和实体瘤患者的经验性抗生素治疗的前瞻性随机评估。欧洲癌症治疗研究组织国际抗菌治疗合作组。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Empiric therapy for febrile granulocytopenic patients is mandatory, but whether monotherapy is a safe alternative and whether fluoroquinolones are useful agents for this indication are still controversial issues. The use of monotherapy with intravenous ciprofloxacin (200 to 300 mg every 12 h) was evaluated against combined therapy with piperacillin plus amikacin in febrile granulocytopenic patients with solid tumor or lymphoma. The study was discontinued prematurely because patients treated with ciprofloxacin had a significantly lower overall success rate than patients treated with piperacillin plus amikacin (31 of 48 patients [65%] versus 48 of 53 patients [91%], P = 0.002). Patients with gram-positive coccal bacteremia had a particularly poor outcome: therapy failed for six of eight patients (75%) treated with ciprofloxacin, while therapy failed for none of four patients treated with piperacillin plus amikacin. Death from primary infection during initially randomized protocol therapy occurred in 7 of 48 patients (14.5%) treated with ciprofloxacin and in 3 of 53 (6%) treated with piperacillin plus amikacin. This study does not support the use of this dose of intravenous ciprofloxacin as empiric monotherapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients.
机译:对发热性粒细胞减少症患者进行经验性治疗是强制性的,但是单药治疗是否是安全的替代方法以及氟喹诺酮类药物是否可用于该适应症仍是有争议的问题。对于伴有实体瘤或淋巴瘤的发热性粒细胞减少性患者,评估了静脉环丙沙星(每12小时200至300 mg)单药治疗与哌拉西林加阿米卡星联合治疗的效果。由于环丙沙星治疗的患者总成功率显着低于哌拉西林加丁胺卡那霉素治疗的患者(48例中的31例[65%],而53例中的48例[91%],P = 0.002),因此该研究被提前终止。革兰氏阳性球菌菌血症患者的预后特别差:环丙沙星治疗的八名患者中有六名(75%)治疗失败,而哌拉西林加丁胺卡那霉素治疗的四名患者中没有治疗失败。在最初的随机方案治疗期间,原发感染的死亡发生在环丙沙星治疗的48例患者中的7例(占14.5%)和哌拉西林加丁胺卡那霉素治疗的53例中的3例(6%)中。这项研究不支持使用这种剂量的环丙沙星静脉注射作为粒细胞减少症患者发烧的经验性单一疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号