首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Comparison of rapid NFT and API 20E with conventional methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermentative bacilli from pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.
【2h】

Comparison of rapid NFT and API 20E with conventional methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermentative bacilli from pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.

机译:快速NFT和API 20E与用于从药品和化妆品中鉴定革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的常规方法的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The accuracy of the Rapid NFT and the API 20E identification systems was evaluated by comparing them with conventional biochemical methods for the identification of gram-negative, nonfermentative bacilli. The organisms were recovered from preserved, nonsterile pharmaceutical and cosmetic products. A total of 123 test isolates that are commonly encountered in these products were used. By using the criteria of accurate and reliable identification without employing additional tests, Rapid NFT was found to be more accurate after 48 h of incubation than API 20E for characterizing isolates to the species level. Therefore, close agreement between NFT and conventional methods for identification of industrial gram-negative isolates provides evidence that the Rapid NFT system is an improved and rapid method for identifying these organisms to the species level with minimal use of supplementary tests.
机译:快速NFT和API 20E鉴定系统的准确性通过与常规生化方法鉴定革兰氏阴性,非发酵菌的比较来评估。从保存的非无菌药品和化妆品中回收生物。这些产品中总共使用了123种测试分离株。通过使用准确可靠的鉴定标准而不进行额外的测试,发现快速NFT在培养48小时后比API 20E更准确,可将分离株鉴定到物种水平。因此,NFT与鉴定工业革兰氏阴性分离株的常规方法之间的紧密一致性提供了证据,表明快速NFT系统是一种在不使用辅助测试的情况下,将这些生物鉴定到物种水平的快速改进方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号